The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metabolic monitoring of breast cancer chemohormonotherapy using positron emission tomography: initial evaluation.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We assessed the feasibility of noninvasive metabolic monitoring of cancer chemohormonotherapy using sequential quantitative positron emission tomographic (PET) scans of tumor glucose metabolism with the glucose analog 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancers larger than 3 cm in diameter beginning a chemohormonotherapy program underwent a baseline and four follow-up quantitative PET scans during the first three cycles of treatment (days 0 to 63). Tumor response was sequentially determined clinically, radiographically, and then pathologically after nine treatment cycles. RESULTS: Eight patients had partial or complete pathologic responses. Their maximal tumor uptake of FDG assessed by PET decreased promptly with treatment to the following: day 8, 78 +/- 9.2% (P < .03); day 21, 68.1 +/- 7.5% (P < .025); day 42, 60 +/- 5.1% (P < .001); day 63, 52.4 +/- 4.4% (P < .0001) of the basal values. Tumor diameter did not decrease significantly during this period through 63 days. Prompt decreases in the FDG influx rate (K) from basal levels (from .019 to .014 mL/cm3/min) after 8 days of treatment (P < .02) and in the estimated rate of FDG phosphorylation to FDG-6-phosphate (k3) from .055 to .038 min-1 after 8 days of treatment (P < .02) to .029 +/- .004 min-1 at 21 days) (P < .02) were observed. Three nonresponding patients had no significant decrease in tumor uptake of FDG (81 +/- 18% of basal value), influx rate (.015 to .012 mL/cm3/min), or tumor size (81 +/- 12% of basal diameter) comparing basal versus 63-day posttreatment values. CONCLUSION: Quantitative FDG PET scans of primary breast cancers showed a rapid and significant decrease in tumor glucose metabolism after effective treatment was initiated, with the reduction in metabolism antedating any decrement in tumor size. No significant decrease in FDG uptake (SUV) after three cycles of treatment was observed in the nonresponding patients. FDG PET scanning has substantial promise as an early noninvasive metabolic marker of the efficacy of cancer treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters
Marquardt, D. W. (1963) · Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/0111030 · Cited by 30,728
Cited by
From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors
Wahl, R. L., Jacene, H., Kasamon, Y., & Lodge, M. A. (2009) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.108.057307 · Cited by 3,777
“Because ROIs whose size is based on a 50%, or other, ROI threshold vary with the variability of the maximal pixel chosen, these were not chosen as the primary measurement metric.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 943
(2004) · PubMed · Cited by 653
Schelling, M., Avril, N., Nährig, J., Kuhn, W., Römer, W., Sattler, D., Werner, M., Dose, J., Jänicke, F., Graeff, H., et al. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2000.18.8.1689 · Cited by 522
Blodgett, T. M., Meltzer, C. C., & Townsend, D. W. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2422051113 · Cited by 387
Metadata
- Authors
- Wahl, R. L., Zasadny, K., Helvie, M., Hutchins, G. D., Weber, B., & Cody, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2101-2111
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2225412566
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic monitoring of breast cancer chemohormonotherapy using positron emission tomography: initial evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1993.11.11.2101
- The paper
- Wahl, R. L., Zasadny, K., Helvie, M., Hutchins, G. D., Weber, B., & Cody, R. (1993). Metabolic monitoring of breast cancer chemohormonotherapy using positron emission tomography: initial evaluation. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1993.11.11.2101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.