The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characteristics of women at risk for psychosocial distress in the year after breast cancer.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To provide a detailed description of rehabilitation problems of women, considered to be low risk and at risk for psychosocial morbidity, diagnosed with stage I and II breast cancer 1 month and 1 year after primary treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A sample of 227 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients were systematically interviewed by a clinical social worker and classified for risk of psychosocial distress in the year after diagnosis. They completed a battery of standardized instruments to assess quality of life (QL), rehabilitation needs, and psychologic distress. The primary QL instrument, the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System (CARES), provides a detailed listing of rehabilitation needs. Descriptive CARES data are presented with comparisons between the two groups. RESULTS: The at-risk women had significantly more problems with greater severity than the low-risk women in all areas (physical, psychosocial, medical interaction, sexual, and marital). While both groups showed improvement over the year following diagnosis, the at-risk group had significantly more problems 1 year later. Many physical problems subside, but problems at the local surgical site, psychologic distress, communication with marital partners, and negative body image are more persistent in the at-risk group 1 year later, while half of both groups continue to have sexual dysfunction. CONCLUSION: The detailed listing of problems provided by the CARES may be helpful to clinicians in their interactions with patients. The need for preventive and early intervention for the at-risk patients is underscored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychosocial correlates of breast cancer and its treatments.
Meyerowitz, B. E. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.87.1.108 · Cited by 331
Cited by
Antoni, M. H., Lehman, J. M., Kilbourn, K. M., Boyers, A. E., Culver, J. L., Alferi, S. M., Yount, S. E., McGregor, B. A., Arena, P. L., Harris, S. D., et al. (2001) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.20.1.20 · Cited by 1,011
Ganz, P. A., Rowland, J. H., Desmond, K., Meyerowitz, B. E., & Wyatt, G. E. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1998.16.2.501 · Cited by 963
Self-citationQuality of Life Among Younger Women With Breast Cancer
Avis, N. E., Crawford, S., & Manuel, J. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.130 · Cited by 529
Age-related differences in the quality of life of breast carcinoma patients after treatment
Wenzel, L. B., Fairclough, D. L., Brady, M. J., Cella, D., Garrett, K. M., Kluhsman, B. C., Crane, L. A., & Marcus, A. C. (1999) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19991101)86:9<1768::aid-cncr19>3.0.co;2-o · Cited by 329
Czarny, P., Wigner, P., Galecki, P., & Sliwinski, T. (2018) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.06.036 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Schag, C. A., Ganz, P. A., Polinsky, M. L., Fred, C., Hirji, K., & Petersen, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1993-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 783-793
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2269819408
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characteristics of women at risk for psychosocial distress in the year after breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1993.11.4.783
- The paper
- Schag, C. A., Ganz, P. A., Polinsky, M. L., Fred, C., Hirji, K., & Petersen, L. (1993). Characteristics of women at risk for psychosocial distress in the year after breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1993.11.4.783
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.