Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment.

Open access
Brodeur, G M, Pritchard, J, Berthold, F, Carlsen, N L, Castel, V, Castelberry, R P, De Bernardi, B, Evans, A E, Favrot, M, Hedborg, F·1993·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE AND METHODS: Based on preliminary experience, there was a need for modifications and clarifications in the International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) and International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria (INRC). In 1988, a proposal was made to establish an internationally accepted staging system for neuroblastoma, as well as consistent criteria for confirming the diagnosis and determining response to therapy (Brodeur GM, et al: J Clin Oncol 6:1874-1881, 1988). A meeting was held to review experience with the INSS and INRC and to revise or clarify the language and intent of the originally proposed criteria. Substantial changes included a redefinition of the midline, restrictions on age and bone marrow involvement for stage 4S, and the recommendation that meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scanning be implemented for evaluating the extent of disease. Other modifications and clarifications of the INSS and INRC are presented. In addition, the criteria for the diagnosis of neuroblastoma were modified. Finally, proposals were made for the development of risk groups that incorporate both clinical and biologic features in the prediction of prognosis. The biologic features that were deemed important to evaluate prospectively included serum ferritin, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH); tumor histology; tumor-cell DNA content; assessment of N-myc copy number; assessment of 1p deletion by cytogenetic or molecular methods; and TRK-A expression. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Modifications of the INSS and INRC made at this conference are presented. In addition, proposals are made for future modifications in these criteria and for the development of International Neuroblastoma Risk Groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1993.11.8.1466

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 2,294

Metadata

Authors
Brodeur, G. M., Pritchard, J., Berthold, F., Carlsen, N. L., Castel, V, Castelberry, R. P., De Bernardi, B., Evans, A. E., Favrot, M., & Hedborg, F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1993-08
Volume
11
Issue
8
Pages
1466-1477
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2096398040
Cited by
2,294
References
1
FWCI
20.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1993.11.8.1466
The paper
Brodeur, G. M., Pritchard, J., Berthold, F., Carlsen, N. L., Castel, V, Castelberry, R. P., De Bernardi, B., Evans, A. E., Favrot, M., & Hedborg, F. (1993). Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1993.11.8.1466

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.