The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Randomized comparison of two schedules of fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare two commonly used schedules of fluorouracil (5FU) and leucovorin in the treatment of patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer. Each of these dosage administration schedules has been demonstrated to be superior to single-agent bolus 5FU in previous controlled trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy-two ambulatory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were stratified according to performance status, and presence and location of any measurable indicator lesion(s). They were then randomized to receive chemotherapy with one of the following regimens: (1) intensive-course 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin (5FU 425 mg/m2 plus leucovorin 20 mg/m2 intravenous [IV] push daily for 5 days with courses repeated at 4- to 5-week intervals); (2) weekly 5FU plus high-dose leucovorin (5FU 600 mg/m2 IV push plus leucovorin 500 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion weekly for 6 weeks with courses repeated every 8 weeks). RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-two of 372 patients randomized (97.3%) were eligible and included in the analysis. Three hundred forty-six patients (95.6%) have died. There were no significant differences in therapeutic efficacy between the two 5FU/leucovorin regimens tested with respect to the following parameters: objective tumor response (35% v 31%), survival (median, 9.3 v 10.7 months), and palliative effects (as assessed by relief of symptoms, improved performance status, and weight gain). There were significant (P < .05) differences in toxicity, with more leukopenia and stomatitis seen with the intensive-course regimen, and more diarrhea and requirement for hospitalization to manage toxicity with the weekly regimen. Financial cost was also higher with the weekly regimen. CONCLUSION: Intensive-course 5FU plus low-dose leucovorin appears to have a superior therapeutic index compared with weekly 5FU plus high-dose leucovorin using the dosage administration schedules applied in this study based on similar therapeutic effectiveness, but lower financial cost, and less need for hospitalization to manage chemotherapy toxicity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
O'Connell, M. J., Mailliard, J. A., Kahn, M. J., Macdonald, J. S., Haller, D. G., Mayer, R. J., & Wieand, H. S. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1997.15.1.246 · Cited by 585
Self-citationClinical studies of three oral prodrugs of 5-fluorouracil (capecitabine, UFT, S-1): A review
Malet-Martino, M., & Martino, R. (2002) · The Oncologist · doi:10.1634/theoncologist.7-4-288 · Cited by 382
Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Current Options, Current Evidence
Kelly, H., & Goldberg, R. M. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.17.749 · Cited by 316
Women Experience Greater Toxicity With Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer
Sloan, J. A. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.20.6.1491 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Buroker, T. R., O'Connell, M. J., Wieand, H. S., Krook, J. E., Gerstner, J. B., Mailliard, J. A., Schaefer, P. L., Levitt, R., Kardinal, C. G., & Gesme, D. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-20
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1888050314
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized comparison of two schedules of fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1994.12.1.14
- The paper
- Buroker, T. R., O'Connell, M. J., Wieand, H. S., Krook, J. E., Gerstner, J. B., Mailliard, J. A., Schaefer, P. L., Levitt, R., Kardinal, C. G., & Gesme, D. H. (1994). Randomized comparison of two schedules of fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1994.12.1.14
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.