The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transplantation of enriched CD34-positive autologous marrow into breast cancer patients following high-dose chemotherapy: influence of CD34-positive peripheral-blood progenitors and growth factors on engraftment.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the capacity of enriched CD34-positive (CD34+) progenitor cells to reconstitute hematopoiesis in poor-prognosis breast cancer patients following administration of a high-dose alkylating agent chemotherapy regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four breast cancer patients received high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow support (ABMS) with CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells in five sequentially treated cohorts. Following infusion of CD34+ marrow, cohort no. 1 received no growth factor, cohort no. 2 received granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and cohort no. 3 received granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Cohort no. 4 received the CD34+ fractions of both marrow and peripheral-blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) plus G-CSF. Cohort no. 5 received only the CD34+ PBPCs plus G-CSF. Immunohistochemical staining for breast cancer was performed on all hematopoietic cell products before and after the positive selection procedure, to assess quantitatively the level of tumor-cell contamination. RESULTS: Cohorts no. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 achieved a granulocyte count > or = 500 x 10(9)/L in a median of 23, 10, 16, 11, and 11 days, with a platelet count greater than 20,000 x 10(9)/L documented in a median of 22, 23, 32, 12, and 10 days, respectively. The time to granulocyte reconstitution was significantly shorter for patients who received CD34+ PBPCs alone (cohort no. 5), or in combination with CD34+ marrow (cohort no. 4), when compared with those who received only the CD34+ marrow fraction (P < .01). From 1 to greater than 4 logs of breast cancer cell depletion were documented after CD34-selection, for patients in whom tumor was initially detected. CONCLUSION: CD34+ marrow and/or PBPCs provide reliable and timely hematopoietic reconstitution in breast cancer patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy. Contamination of both marrow and PBPCs with breast cancer cells was reduced using this positive selection technique.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blair, A., Hogge, D. E., Ailles, L. E., Lansdorp, P. M., & Sutherland, H. J. (1997) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v89.9.3104 · Cited by 335
Nachbaur, D., Kropshofer, G., Heitger, A., Lätzer, K., Glassl, H., Ludescher, C., Nussbaumer, W., & Niederwieser, D. (2000) · Journal of Hematotherapy & Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1089/15258160050196777 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Shpall, E. J., Jones, R. B., Bearman, S. I., Franklin, W. A., Archer, P. G., Curiel, T., Bitter, M., Claman, H. N., Stemmer, S. M., & Purdy, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-36
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1852147417
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transplantation of enriched CD34-positive autologous marrow into breast cancer patients following high-dose chemotherapy: influence of CD34-positive peripheral-blood progenitors and growth factors on engraftment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1994.12.1.28
- The paper
- Shpall, E. J., Jones, R. B., Bearman, S. I., Franklin, W. A., Archer, P. G., Curiel, T., Bitter, M., Claman, H. N., Stemmer, S. M., & Purdy, M. (1994). Transplantation of enriched CD34-positive autologous marrow into breast cancer patients following high-dose chemotherapy: influence of CD34-positive peripheral-blood progenitors and growth factors on engraftment. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1994.12.1.28
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.