Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 436

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Population study of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in cancer patients.

Etienne, M C, Lagrange, J L, Dassonville, O, Fleming, R, Thyss, A, Renée, N, Schneider, M, Demard, F, Milano, G·1994·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted a prospective study on a large set of cancer patients in an attempt to evaluate the incidence of complete or partial dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency as found in peripheral mononuclear cells (PMNC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eighty-five unselected consecutive cancer patients were included. The population consisted of 152 men (mean age, 62.1 years; range, 35 to 90) and 33 women (mean age, 59.2 years; range, 36 to 77). Sixty-eight were head and neck patients treated by a 5-day continuous infusion of fluorouracil (FU; starting dose, 1 g/m2/d, with dose adaptation based on pharmacokinetics) for which DPD activity was measured 2 to 3 days before FU administration (94 cycles analyzed). PMNC-DPD activity was measured by a radio-enzymatic assay using carbon-14-FU. RESULTS: DPD activity in the entire population showed a unimodal distribution, which globally fits a gaussian distribution. Mean and median DPD activity values were 0.222 and 0.211 nmol/min/mg protein, respectively (range, 0.065 to 0.559). No total DPD deficiency was found. Multifactor analysis of variance showed that liver function (biologic evaluation) and age did not influence DPD activity, but that DPD activity was, on average, 15% lower in women (0.194 nmol/min/mg protein) than in men (0.228 nmol/min/mg protein) (P = .03). No difference was demonstrated between premenopausal and postmenopausal women. In patients treated with FU, the risk of developing side effects was not linked to pretreatment DPD activity. FU-related toxicity was linked to FU systemic exposure. The correlation between pretreatment DPD activity and FU systemic clearance (CI) was weak (n = 90, linear regression r = .31, P = .002). Pretreatment DPD activity in patients who required a dose reduction was not significantly different from DPD activity in patients who did not require dose modification. CONCLUSION: From the present study, it appears that total DPD deficiency is a rare event. Although pretreatment DPD activity cannot be a useful indicator for improving FU dose adaptation strategy, the identification of severe DPD deficiency (< 0.100 nmol/min/mg protein) could lead to starting the treatment with a markedly reduced FU dose or even to using an alternative chemotherapy regimen.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1994.12.11.2248

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 436

Metadata

Authors
Etienne, M. C., Lagrange, J. L., Dassonville, O., Fleming, R., Thyss, A., Renée, N., Schneider, M., Demard, F., & Milano, G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1994-11
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
2248-2253
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1844681537
Cited by
436
References
0
FWCI
9.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population study of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in cancer patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1994.12.11.2248
The paper
Etienne, M. C., Lagrange, J. L., Dassonville, O., Fleming, R., Thyss, A., Renée, N., Schneider, M., Demard, F., & Milano, G. (1994). Population study of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1994.12.11.2248

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.