The DOI matches its Crossref record.
European-Canadian randomized trial of paclitaxel in relapsed ovarian cancer: high-dose versus low-dose and long versus short infusion.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT) is a new anticancer agent with activity in a number of human tumors, including epithelial ovarian cancer. In nonrandomized trials, doses studied have ranged from 135 mg/m2 to 250 mg/m2 administered over 24 hours with premedication to avoid hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). This study addressed two questions: the dose-response relationship of Taxol in relapsed ovarian cancer and the safety of a short infusion given with premedication. METHODS: Women with platinum-pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer and measurable recurrent disease were randomized in a bifactorial design to receive either 175 or 135 mg/m2 of Taxol over either 24 or 3 hours. Major end points were the frequency of significant HSRs and objective response rate. Secondary end points were progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Of 407 patients randomized, 391 were eligible and 382 assessable for response. Analysis was performed according to the bifactorial design. Severe HSRs were rare (1.5% patients) and were not affected by either dose or schedule. Response was slightly higher at the 175-mg/m2 dose (20%) than at 135 mg/m2 (15%), but this was not statistically significant (P = .2). However, progression-free survival was significantly longer in the high-dose group (19 v 14 weeks; P = .02). Significantly more neutropenia was seen when Taxol was administered as a 24-hour infusion. Response rates were similar in the 24- and 3-hour groups (19% and 16%, respectively; P = .6). No survival differences were noted. CONCLUSION: The 3-hour infusion of Taxol is safe when given with premedication and is associated with less neutropenia. There is a modest dose effect with longer time to progression at 175 mg/m2. The observation that longer infusion produces more myelosuppression but does not yield higher response rates should lead to further studies to determine the optimal dose and schedule of this interesting new agent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rowinsky, E. K., & Donehower, R. C. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199504133321507 · Cited by 1,924
Lee, K. S., Chung, H. C., Im, S. A., Park, Y. H., Kim, C. S., Kim, S.-B., Rha, S. Y., Lee, M. Y., & Ro, J. (2008) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-007-9591-y · Cited by 541
Creemers, G. J., Bolis, G., Gore, M., Scarfone, G., Lacave, A. J., Guastalla, J. P., Despax, R., Favalli, G., Kreinberg, R., Van Belle, S., et al. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1996.14.12.3056 · Cited by 377
Self-citationLiggins, R. T., & Burt, H. M. (2002) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00016-9 · Cited by 286
Ovarian cancer relapse: From the latest scientific evidence to the best practice
Luvero, D., Plotti, F., Aloisia, A., Montera, R., Terranova, C., Nardone, C. D. C., Scaletta, G., Lopez, S., Miranda, A., Capriglione, S., et al. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.05.014 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Eisenhauer, E. A., ten Bokkel Huinink, W. W., Swenerton, K. D., Gianni, L., Myles, J., van der Burg, M. E., Kerr, I., Vermorken, J. B., Buser, K., & Colombo, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2654-2666
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1845622004
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European-Canadian randomized trial of paclitaxel in relapsed ovarian cancer: high-dose versus low-dose and long versus short infusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1994.12.12.2654
- The paper
- Eisenhauer, E. A., ten Bokkel Huinink, W. W., Swenerton, K. D., Gianni, L., Myles, J., van der Burg, M. E., Kerr, I., Vermorken, J. B., Buser, K., & Colombo, N. (1994). European-Canadian randomized trial of paclitaxel in relapsed ovarian cancer: high-dose versus low-dose and long versus short infusion. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1994.12.12.2654
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.