The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk factors in breast-conservation therapy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify clinical and pathologic factors associated with an increased risk of local recurrence following breast-conservation therapy (BCT) to assess the safety of this procedure for all subgroups of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 1,026 patients with clinical stage I and II breast cancer treated between 1979 and 1988 at the Netherlands Cancer Institute. The BCT regimen consisted of local excision and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) followed by whole-breast irradiation to a total dose of 50 Gy in 2-Gy fractions and boost irradiation (mostly by iridium implant) of 15 to 25 Gy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up duration of 66 months, the actuarial breast recurrence rate was 4% at 5 years, counting all breast recurrences. Univariate analysis showed seven factors to be associated with an increased risk of local recurrence; age, residual tumor at reexcision, histologic tumor type, presence of any carcinoma-in-situ component, vascular invasion, microscopic margin involvement, and whole-breast radiation dose. Three factors remained independently significant after proportional hazard regression analysis: age, margin involvement, and the presence of vascular invasion. When the analysis was repeated, but counting only those breast recurrences that occurred before regional or distant failures, only young age and vascular invasion were independent predictive factors. In the third analysis, factors predicting the necessity of local salvage treatment were analyzed. In this analysis, the possible bias in the former analysis caused by censoring actuarial methods was avoided. The results were the same as in the second analysis, showing young age and vascular invasion as the only independent predictive factors. Breast recurrence rates were 6% for patients less than 40 years of age and 8% for patients with tumors showing vascular invasion. In the absence of risk factors, the breast recurrence rate is only 1% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: Slightly higher recurrence rates were found in patients less than 40 years of age and in patients with tumors showing vascular invasion. The role of margin involvement is uncertain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metabolic shifts in residual breast cancer drive tumor recurrence
Havas, K. M., Milchevskaya, V., Radic, K., Alladin, A., Kafkia, E., Garcia, M., Stolte, J., Klaus, B., Rotmensz, N., Gibson, T. J., et al. (2017) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci89914 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Borger, J., Kemperman, H., Hart, A., Peterse, H., van Dongen, J., & Bartelink, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 653-660
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1787821550
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors in breast-conservation therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1994.12.4.653
- The paper
- Borger, J., Kemperman, H., Hart, A., Peterse, H., van Dongen, J., & Bartelink, H. (1994). Risk factors in breast-conservation therapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1994.12.4.653
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.