The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Survival benefit of repeat liver resections for recurrent colorectal metastases: 143 cases. Association Francaise de Chirurgie.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Resection is the only chance for cure in patients with colorectal liver metastases (LM). Five-year survival rates are close to 25%. Unfortunately, recurrences occur in most patients. Some recurrent LM are technically resectable. The aim of this study was to determine the risks and benefits of repeat resections for recurrent LM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 130 patients who received 143 repeat liver resections for recurrent LM were collected. In 116 patients, only the liver was involved, while 14 had both liver and extrahepatic recurrences. RESULTS: In the first group, the operative mortality and morbidity rates were 0.9% and 24.7%, respectively. Two- and 3-year survival rates were 57% and 33%, respectively. Recurrences were observed in 66% of patients. Twelve patients underwent a third hepatectomy for recurrence. The mortality rate was nil, and the mean survival time was 12.5 months. In the group with liver and extrahepatic metastases, the operative mortality and morbidity rates were 0% and 25%. The mean survival time was 16 months. Eleven patients died and 13 had recurrences during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Some hepatic recurrences after surgical excision of colorectal metastases can be resected with a low operative risk and with a long-term survival rate similar to that obtained after first resections. This emphasizes the need for a careful follow-up after hepatectomy for colorectal metastases to detect resectable recurrences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Watanabe, T., Muro, K., Ajioka, Y., Hashiguchi, Y., Ito, Y., Saito, Y., Hamaguchi, T., Ishida, H., Ishiguro, M., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s10147-017-1101-6 · Cited by 2,467
Hashiguchi, Y., Muro, K., Saito, Y., Ito, Y., Ajioka, Y., Hamaguchi, T., Hasegawa, K., Hotta, K., Ishida, H., Ishiguro, M., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s10147-019-01485-z · Cited by 1,922
Resection of colorectal liver metastases
Scheele, J., Stang, R., Altendorf‐Hofmann, A., & Paul, M. (1995) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/bf00316981 · Cited by 1,539
Trends in Long-Term Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatic Colorectal Metastases
Choti, M. A., Sitzmann, J. V., Tiburi, M. F., Sumetchotimetha, W., Rangsin, R., Schulick, R. D., Lillemoe, K. D., Yeo, C. J., & Cameron, J. L. (2002) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200206000-00002 · Cited by 1,454
Petrowsky, H., Gonen, M., Jarnagin, W., Lorenz, M., DeMatteo, R., Heinrich, S., Encke, A., Blumgart, L., & Fong, Y. (2002) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000658-200206000-00015 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Nordlinger, B., Vaillant, J. C., Guiguet, M., Balladur, P., Paris, F., Bachellier, P., & Jaeck, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1491-1496
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1848603902
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival benefit of repeat liver resections for recurrent colorectal metastases: 143 cases. Association Francaise de Chirurgie. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1994.12.7.1491
- The paper
- Nordlinger, B., Vaillant, J. C., Guiguet, M., Balladur, P., Paris, F., Bachellier, P., & Jaeck, D. (1994). Survival benefit of repeat liver resections for recurrent colorectal metastases: 143 cases. Association Francaise de Chirurgie. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1994.12.7.1491
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.