The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase II trial of docetaxel in advanced anthracycline-resistant or anthracenedione-resistant breast cancer.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) resistant to doxorubicin or mitoxantrone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was administered as a 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion every 3 weeks to 42 patients registered at four centers. Patients must have received at least one but no more than two prior chemotherapy regimens for MBC (in addition to any prior adjuvant therapy). One of the regimens for metastatic breast cancer must have included an anthracycline or anthracenedione and the cancer must have progressed on that regimen. RESULTS: Objective responses were seen in 20 of 35 assessable patients (three complete responses [CRs] and 17 partial responses [PRs]), for an objective response rate of 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 39% to 74%) and in 21 of 42 registered patients (50% response rate [RR]; 95% CI, 34% to 66%) entered onto the trial. The median response duration was 28 weeks. The most common toxicity in this study was grade 4 neutropenia, which occurred in 95% of patients. Other clinically significant nonhematologic side effects included stomatitis, skin reactions, neurosensory changes, asthenia, and fluid retention. Patients who received dexamethasone premedication had a later onset of fluid retention than those who did not receive dexamethasone (onset at a median cumulative docetaxel dose of 503 mg/m2 and 291 mg/m2, respectively). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel at this dose and schedule has a high level of antitumor activity in patients with treatment-refractory advanced breast cancer, and appears to be one of the most active agents for the treatment of this patient population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bruno, R., Hille, D., Riva, A., Vivier, N., ten Bokkel Huinnink, W. W., van Oosterom, A. T., Kaye, S. B., Verweij, J., Fossella, F. V., Valero, V, et al. (1998) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1998.16.1.187 · Cited by 423
Self-citationTherapeutic options for metastatic breast cancer
Morris, P. G., McArthur, H. L., & Hudis, C. A. (2009) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1517/14656560902834961 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Ravdin, P. M., Burris, H. A., Cook, G., Eisenberg, P., Kane, M., Bierman, W. A., Mortimer, J., Genevois, E., & Bellet, R. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2879-2885
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1846747462
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II trial of docetaxel in advanced anthracycline-resistant or anthracenedione-resistant breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1995.13.12.2879
- The paper
- Ravdin, P. M., Burris, H. A., Cook, G., Eisenberg, P., Kane, M., Bierman, W. A., Mortimer, J., Genevois, E., & Bellet, R. E. (1995). Phase II trial of docetaxel in advanced anthracycline-resistant or anthracenedione-resistant breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1995.13.12.2879
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.