Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 52Estrogen and related hormone effectsThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thyroid function test changes with adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.

Mamby, C C, Love, R R, Lee, K E·1995·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: While tamoxifen has been shown to alter concentration of many hormones and their binding globulins, there have been conflicting results regarding its effects on thyroid function tests. We sought to clarify these effects by studying subjects in a controlled clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated a subset of postmenopausal women who had participated in a longitudinal, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled toxicity study of tamoxifen 10 mg orally, twice daily. There were 14 subjects in both the tamoxifen and placebo groups. Measurement of thyroid-binding globulin (TBG), thyroxine uptake (T-Uptake), thyroxine (T4), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and an indirect estimate of the free T4 index (FTI), were made for each subject before and after 3 months of treatment. RESULTS: For T-Uptake, T4, and TBG, there were significant increases in the mean change from baseline to 3 months in the tamoxifen group compared with the placebo group (P = .02, .0001, and .003, respectively), while there were no significant changes in the measured TSH and in the calculated FTI. CONCLUSION: We conclude that tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women results in increased TBG, with secondary increases in measured T-Uptake and T4 following. However, TSH and FTI levels are unchanged, and treated women remain eumetabolic.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1995.13.4.854

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Mamby, C. C., Love, R. R., & Lee, K. E.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1995-04
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
854-857
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1804300286
Cited by
52
References
7
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2r01ca050243-03)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 50243)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR03186)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
tamoxifen, thyroid function tests, thyroxine-binding globulin, thyroxine uptake, thyroxine, thyroid-stimulating hormone, free T4 index, postmenopausal women, breast cancer, adjuvant endocrine therapy
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Tamoxifen, Thyroid Function Tests, Thyroid Gland, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, Thyroxine-Binding Proteins, Postmenopause

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.