The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cancer Research Campaign phase II trial of temozolomide in metastatic melanoma.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Sixty patients with metastatic melanoma were treated in a phase II study with the imidazotetrazine derivative temozolamide to assess further the efficacy demonstrated in previous phase I studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five of 56 eligible patients were assessable for toxicity and 49 for response. The patients received temozolomide 150 mg/m2/d over 5 successive days orally (total dose, 750 mg/m2) in the first course. Courses were repeated every 4 weeks and the dose was escalated to 200 mg/m2/d x 5 (total dose, 1 g/m2) after the first course if toxicity was acceptable. Patients were all chemotherapy-naive, except for two who had previously received interferon alfa and one who had received interleukin-2 (the latter patient had also received two phase I drugs some time previously). RESULTS: A complete response (CR) was documented in three patients (all with lung metastases) and a partial response (PR) in nine patients (21% CR plus PR rate). Seven of 56 patients were not assessable for response because of early death or deterioration. The overall response rate excluding these patients is 12 of 49 (24%). The median response duration was 6 months (range, 2.5 to 22+). Toxicity of the regimen, which was mainly hematopoietic, was low. The median survival duration for all patients was 5.5 months (range, 0.5 to 29.5). For responders, the median survival duration was 14.5 months (range, 3 to 28+), with four patients still alive. CONCLUSION: Temozolomide in the schedule used has as good activity in chemotherapy-naive metastatic melanoma as the other most active agents currently in use. Further studies of the drug on its own and in combination with other agents is recommended.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yung, W. K. A., Albright, R. E., Olson, J., Fredericks, R., Fink, K., Prados, M. D., Brada, M., Spence, A., Hohl, R. J., Shapiro, W., et al. (2000) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1054/bjoc.2000.1316 · Cited by 929
“TMZ has notable antitumour activity against recurrent GBM, recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma, and advanced malignant melanoma, and other refractory cancers (Newlands et al, 1992, 1996; O’Reilly et al, 1993; Bleehen et al, 1995; Bower et al, 1997).”
BackgroundDiagnosis and treatment of melanoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline
Garbe, C., Peris, K., Hauschild, A., Saiag, P., Middleton, M., Spatz, A., Grob, J.-J., Malvehy, J., Newton-Bishop, J., Stratigos, A., et al. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2009.10.032 · Cited by 317
Vörsmann, H., Groeber, F., Walles, H., Busch, S., Beissert, S., Walczak, H., & Kulms, D. (2013) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2013.249 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Bleehen, N. M., Newlands, E. S., Lee, S. M., Thatcher, N., Selby, P., Calvert, A. H., Rustin, G. J., Brampton, M., & Stevens, M. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 910-913
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1835101589
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Research Campaign phase II trial of temozolomide in metastatic melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1995.13.4.910
- The paper
- Bleehen, N. M., Newlands, E. S., Lee, S. M., Thatcher, N., Selby, P., Calvert, A. H., Rustin, G. J., Brampton, M., & Stevens, M. F. (1995). Cancer Research Campaign phase II trial of temozolomide in metastatic melanoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1995.13.4.910
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.