The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase I/II clinical and pharmacokinetic evaluation of liposomal daunorubicin.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Since liposomal encapsulation of anticancer drugs may enhance antitumor activity while reducing toxicity in vitro, we evaluated liposomally encapsulated daunorubucin (DaunoXome; Vestar, Inc, San Dimas, CA) for safety, pharmacokinetics, and potential efficacy in patients with AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma (AIDS-KS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with advanced AIDS-KS were accrued. Successive cohorts received DaunoXome at doses of 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks, and 40, 50, and 60 mg/m2 given once every 2 weeks. Selected KS and solid-tumor patients underwent pharmacokinetic evaluation. RESULTS: The area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) ranged from 16.9 micrograms.h/mL to 375.3 micrograms./mL and the alpha half-life ranged from 7.8 to 8.3 hours at 10 mg/m2 to 60 mg/m2, respectively. Both pharmacokinetic profiles were significantly better compared with free daunorubicin. DaunoXome was well tolerated with no significant alopecia, mucositis, or vomiting. Neutropenia (< 1,000/microL occurred in 17% of cycles and was severe (< 500/microL) in only 2%. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were uncommon. Other adverse events included mild to moderate fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea. Even after cumulative doses greater than 1,000 mg/m2, no significant declines in cardiac function were observed. Twenty-two patients who received 50 and 60 mg/m2 were assessable for tumor response; 12 (55%) had a partial response (PR) or clinical complete response (CR). The median survival duration in all patients was 9 months. Prognostic factors for short survival were low CD4 lymphocyte counts (P = .004) and prior anthracycline therapy (P = .02). CONCLUSION: DaunoXome has an improved pharmacokinetic profile compared with free daunorubicin, and is well tolerated. DaunoXome can be given safely at doses up to 60 mg/m2 every 2 weeks and has significant antitumor activity in patients with AIDS-KS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pharmacokinetics of Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin: Review of Animal and Human Studies
Gabizon, A., Shmeeda, H., & Barenholz, Y. (2003) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200342050-00002 · Cited by 1,634
Muller, R. H., & Keck, C. M. (2004) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.06.007 · Cited by 819
Clinical Translation of Nanomedicine
Min, Y., Caster, J. M., Eblan, M. J., & Wang, A. Z. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00116 · Cited by 772
Liposomen: Möglichkeiten der Medikamentenfreisetzung
Allen, T. M. (1997) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-199700544-00004 · Cited by 279
Lipid-based nanoparticle formulations for small molecules and RNA drugs
Ickenstein, L. M., & Garidel, P. (2019) · Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery · doi:10.1080/17425247.2019.1669558 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Gill, P. S., Espina, B. M., Muggia, F., Cabriales, S., Tulpule, A., Esplin, J. A., Liebman, H. A., Forssen, E., Ross, M. E., & Levine, A. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 996-1003
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1956382989
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase I/II clinical and pharmacokinetic evaluation of liposomal daunorubicin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1995.13.4.996
- The paper
- Gill, P. S., Espina, B. M., Muggia, F., Cabriales, S., Tulpule, A., Esplin, J. A., Liebman, H. A., Forssen, E., Ross, M. E., & Levine, A. M. (1995). Phase I/II clinical and pharmacokinetic evaluation of liposomal daunorubicin. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1995.13.4.996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.