The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relationship between toxicity and obesity in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: results from cancer and leukemia group B study 8541.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We examined data from a large clinical trial to determine if chemotherapy dosing according to actual body weight places obese patients at greater risk of toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study 8541, a randomized study of schedule and dose of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) for stage II breast cancer patients with positive regional lymph nodes, provided data on 1,435 women for analysis. Using body-mass index (BMI), we classified a woman as obese if her BMI was > or = 27.3 kg/m2; doses were considered weight-based if within 5% of values calculated using actual weight. Our primary analysis concerned toxicity risks during cycle 1. RESULTS: Among women who received weight-based doses of the most dose-intensive CAF regimen, 47% of obese and 51% of nonobese women experienced severe hematologic toxicity (grade > or = 3) during cycle 1 (P = .51, two-tailed). The overall risk ratio (obese v nonobese) of treatment failure among women who received weight-based doses during cycle 1 was 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.26), stratified by treatment and adjusted for number of positive nodes, menopausal status, hormone receptor status, and tumor size. The overall adjusted failure risk ratio (weight-based v reduced initial doses) was 0.73 (95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 1.00) among obese women. CONCLUSION: Obese patients initially dosed (within 5%) by actual weight did not experience excess cycle 1 toxicity or worse outcome compared with nonobese women dosed similarly. The data suggest that obese women who received reduced doses in cycle 1 experienced worse failure-free survival. We recommend that initial doses of CAF be computed according to actual body weight.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effect of obesity on survival of women with breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
Protani, M., Coory, M., & Martin, J. H. (2010) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-010-0990-0 · Cited by 962
Picon‐Ruiz, M., Morata‐Tarifa, C., Valle‐Goffin, J. J., Friedman, E. R., & Slingerland, J. M. (2017) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21405 · Cited by 893
Effect of Obesity on the Pharmacokinetics of Drugs in Humans
Hanley, M. J., Abernethy, D. R., & Greenblatt, D. J. (2010) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/11318100-000000000-00000 · Cited by 773
Weight, Weight Gain, and Survival After Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Kroenke, C. H., Chen, W. Y., Rosner, B., & Holmes, M. D. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.01.079 · Cited by 670
Griggs, J. J., Mangu, P. B., Anderson, H., Balaban, E. P., Dignam, J. J., Hryniuk, W. M., Morrison, V. A., Pini, T. M., Runowicz, C. D., Rosner, G. L., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.39.9436 · Cited by 485
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosner, G. L., Hargis, J. B., Hollis, D. R., Budman, D. R., Weiss, R. B., Henderson, I. C., & Schilsky, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3000-3008
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1879725303
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship between toxicity and obesity in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: results from cancer and leukemia group B study 8541. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1996.14.11.3000
- The paper
- Rosner, G. L., Hargis, J. B., Hollis, D. R., Budman, D. R., Weiss, R. B., Henderson, I. C., & Schilsky, R. L. (1996). Relationship between toxicity and obesity in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: results from cancer and leukemia group B study 8541. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1996.14.11.3000
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.