The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Delay in progression of bone metastases in breast cancer patients treated with intravenous pamidronate: results from a multinational randomized controlled trial. The Aredia Multinational Cooperative Group.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Bone metastases are a major cause of morbidity in breast cancer, resulting in complications that include pain, loss of mobility, pathologic fracture, and tumor-induced hypercalcemia (TIH). Inhibition of osteoclast-mediated bone destruction using bisphosphonates represents a promising new management approach. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients with bone metastases were randomly allocated to receive chemotherapy alone (152 patients) or chemotherapy plus pamidronate 45 mg in 250 mL of saline as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks (143 patients). Whenever possible, treatment continued until progression of disease (PD) in bone appeared on radiographs or bone scan. Time to PD in bone and pain reduction according to a self-assessment six-point scale were selected as primary end points. PD in bone was verified during extramural review (EMR) of all imaging studies by blinded observers, and these data were used as the main efficacy criterion. Analgesic intake, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status, and complications of bone metastases (radiotherapy, TIH, fractures, orthopedic surgery) were also compared in the two groups. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: At EMR, median time to PD in bone was increased by 48% in patients who received pamidronate (249 v 168 days; P = .02, Wilcoxon test). Marked pain relief, defined as a two-point decrease lasting for > or = 6 weeks, was reported by 44% of pamidronate patients and by 30% of controls (P = .025, chi 2 test). The infusions (median, nine per patient; range, 0 to 39) were well tolerated, with no major toxicities reported. Pamidronate by repeated infusion can significantly slow the progression of bone metastases and reduce attendant morbidity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metastatic bone disease: clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies
Coleman, R. E. (2001) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1053/ctrv.2000.0210 · Cited by 1,920
Zheng, Y., Zhou, H., Brennan, K., Blair, J. M., Modzelewski, J. R. K., Seibel, M. J., & Dunstan, C. R. (2007) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.016 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- Conte, P. F., Latreille, J., Mauriac, L., Calabresi, F., Santos, R., Campos, D., Bonneterre, J., Francini, G., & Ford, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2552-2559
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1925515170
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delay in progression of bone metastases in breast cancer patients treated with intravenous pamidronate: results from a multinational randomized controlled trial. The Aredia Multinational Cooperative Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1996.14.9.2552
- The paper
- Conte, P. F., Latreille, J., Mauriac, L., Calabresi, F., Santos, R., Campos, D., Bonneterre, J., Francini, G., & Ford, J. M. (1996). Delay in progression of bone metastases in breast cancer patients treated with intravenous pamidronate: results from a multinational randomized controlled trial. The Aredia Multinational Cooperative Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1996.14.9.2552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.