The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To propose a classification of the acute emetogenicity of antineoplastic chemotherapy agents, and to develop an algorithm to define the emetogenicity of combination chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: A Medline search was conducted to identify (1) clinical trials that used chemotherapy as single-agent therapy, and (2) major reviews of antiemetic therapy. The search was limited to patients who received commonly used doses of chemotherapy agents, primarily by short (< 3 hours) intravenous infusions. Based on review of this information and our collective clinical experience, we assigned chemotherapy agents to one of five emetogenic levels by consensus. A preliminary algorithm to determine the emetogenicity of combination chemotherapy regimens was then designed by consensus. A final algorithm was developed after we analyzed a data base composed of patients treated on the placebo arms of four randomized antiemetic trials. RESULTS: Chemotherapy agents were divided into five levels: level 1 (< 10% of patients experience acute [< or = 24 hours after chemotherapy] emesis without antiemetic prophylaxis); level 2 (10% to 30%); level 3 (30% to 60%); level 4 (60% to 90%); and level 5 (> 90%). For combinations, the emetogenic level was determined by identifying the most emetogenic agent in the combination and then assessing the relative contribution of the other agents. The following rules apply: (1) level 1 agents do not contribute to the emetogenic level of a combination; (2) adding > or = one level 2 agent increases the emetogenicity of the combination by one level greater than the most emetogenic agent in the combination; and (3) adding level 3 or 4 agents increases the emetogenicity of the combination by one level per agent. CONCLUSION: The proposed classification schema provides a practical means to determine the emetogenic potential of individual chemotherapy agents and combination regimens during the 24 hours after administration. This system can serve as a framework for the development of antiemetic guidelines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cohen, L., de Moor, C. A., Eisenberg, P., Ming, E. E., & Hu, H. (2007) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-006-0173-z · Cited by 323
Aprepitant: A Novel Antiemetic for Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting
Massaro, A. M., & Lenz, K. L. (2005) · Annals of Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1345/aph.1e242 · Cited by 73
Arsenic Trioxide and Tretinoin (AsO/ATRA) for Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL)
Damery, E., Solimando, D. A., & Waddell, J. A. (2016) · Hospital Pharmacy · doi:10.1310/hpj5108-628 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Hesketh, P. J., Kris, M. G., Grunberg, S. M., Beck, T., Hainsworth, J. D., Harker, G., Aapro, M. S., Gandara, D., & Lindley, C. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-109
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1876492466
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1997.15.1.103
- The paper
- Hesketh, P. J., Kris, M. G., Grunberg, S. M., Beck, T., Hainsworth, J. D., Harker, G., Aapro, M. S., Gandara, D., & Lindley, C. M. (1997). Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1997.15.1.103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.