The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of advanced breast cancer with sterically stabilized liposomal doxorubicin: results of a multicenter phase II trial.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A multicenter phase II study to determine the activity and toxicity of Caelyx (Doxil; Sequus Pharmaceuticals Inc, Menlo Park, CA) in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with stage IV breast cancer were treated with Caelyx at doses of 45 to 60 mg/m2 every 3 to 4 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. Twenty-eight patients had received prior chemotherapy with a nonanthracycline regimen. Fifty-two patients had disease at multiple sites. Hepatic and pulmonary disease were the predominant metastatic site in 50 patients. Response was assessable in 64 cases. RESULTS: Sixteen patients achieved a partial response and a complete response (overall response rate, 31%; (95% confidence interval, 20% to 43%). Twenty patients (31%) had stable disease on treatment. Neutropenia > or = grade 3 occurred in 10% of cycles (27% of patients) and mucositis > or = grade 3 in 10% of cycles (32% of patients). Significant alopecia was rare and routine prophylactic antiemetics were not required. At doses of 60 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, seven of 13 patients had > or = grade 3 skin toxicity; overall, this toxicity complicated 25% of treatment cycles. The incidence of > or = grade 3 skin toxicity was greatly reduced at doses of 45 mg/m2 every 4 weeks, occurring in five of 32 patients and affecting only 5% of 126 treatment cycles. CONCLUSION: Caelyx is an active agent in advanced breast cancer with a safety profile that differs markedly from nonliposomal doxorubicin. A regimen of 45 mg/m2 every 4 weeks was well tolerated in this cohort of women with advanced poor-prognosis breast cancer. The mild myelosuppression seen with this regimen would favor its use in combination chemotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Andresen, T. L., Jensen, S. S., & Jørgensen, K. (2005) · Progress in Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2004.12.001 · Cited by 580
Danson, S., Ferry, D., Alakhov, V, Margison, J., Kerr, D., Jowle, D., Brampton, M., Halbert, G., & Ranson, M. (2004) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601856 · Cited by 382
Self-citationCharrois, G. J. R., & Allen, T. M. (2004) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2004.03.006 · Cited by 300
Targeted nanoparticles for detecting and treating cancer
Sunderland, C. J., Steiert, M., Talmadge, J. E., Derfus, A. M., & Barry, S. E. (2006) · Drug Development Research · doi:10.1002/ddr.20069 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Ranson, M. R., Carmichael, J., O'Byrne, K., Stewart, S., Smith, D., & Howell, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3185-3191
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1804680040
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of advanced breast cancer with sterically stabilized liposomal doxorubicin: results of a multicenter phase II trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1997.15.10.3185
- The paper
- Ranson, M. R., Carmichael, J., O'Byrne, K., Stewart, S., Smith, D., & Howell, A. (1997). Treatment of advanced breast cancer with sterically stabilized liposomal doxorubicin: results of a multicenter phase II trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1997.15.10.3185
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.