The DOI matches its Crossref record.
International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: a prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cisplatin-containing chemotherapy has dramatically improved the outlook for patients with metastatic germ cell tumors (GCT), and overall cure rates now exceed 80%. To make appropriate risk-based decisions about therapy and to facilitate collaborative trials, a simple prognostic factor-based staging classification is required. MATERIALS: Collaborative groups from 10 countries provided clinical data on patients with metastatic GCT treated with cisplatin-containing chemotherapy. Multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for progression and survival were performed and models were validated on an independent data set. RESULTS: Data were available on 5,202 patients with nonseminomatous GCT (NSGCT) and 660 patients with seminoma. Median follow-up time was 5 years. For NSGCT the following independent adverse factors were identified: mediastinal primary site; degree of elevation of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH); and presence of nonpulmonary visceral metastases (NPVM), such as liver, bone, and brain. For seminoma, the predominant adverse feature was the presence of NPVM. Integration of these factors produced the following groupings: good prognosis, comprising 60% of GCT with a 91% (89% to 93%) 5-year survival rate; intermediate prognosis, comprising 26% of GCT with a 79% (75% to 83%) 5-year survival rate; and poor prognosis, comprising 14% of GCT (all with NSGCT) with a 48% (42% to 54%) 5-year survival rate. CONCLUSION: An easily applicable, clinically based, prognostic classification for GCT has been agreed on between all the major clinical trial groups who are presently active worldwide. This should be used in clinical practice and in the design and reporting of clinical trials to aid international collaboration and understanding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Horwich, A., Shipley, J., & Huddart, R. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68305-0 · Cited by 398
Cierna, Z., Mego, M., Miskovska, V., Machalekova, K., Chovanec, M., Svetlovska, D., Hainova, K., Rejlekova, K., Macak, D., Spanik, S., et al. (2016) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdv574 · Cited by 162
Systemic immune-inflammation index in germ-cell tumours
Chovanec, M., Cierna, Z., Miskovska, V., Machalekova, K., Kalavska, K., Rejlekova, K., Svetlovska, D., Macak, D., Spanik, S., Kajo, K., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2017.460 · Cited by 90
Fankhauser, C. D., Sander, S., Roth, L., Gross, O., Eberli, D., Sulser, T., Seifert, B., Beyer, J., & Hermanns, T. (2018) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2017.467 · Cited by 80
Chovanec, M., Cierna, Z., Miskovska, V., Machalekova, K., Svetlovska, D., Kalavska, K., Rejlekova, K., Spanik, S., Kajo, K., Babal, P., et al. (2017) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.15585 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 594-603
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W44254208
- Cited by
- 1,929
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: a prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1997.15.2.594
- The paper
- International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: a prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group. (1997). Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1997.15.2.594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.