The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Liver resection for colorectal metastases.
Abstract
PURPOSE: More than 50,000 patients in the United States will present each year with liver metastases from colorectal cancers. The current study was performed to determine if liver resection for colorectal metastases is safe and effective and to evaluate predictors of outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for 456 consecutive resections performed between July 1985 and December 1991 in a tertiary referral center were analyzed. RESULTS: The perioperative mortality rate was 2.8%, with a mortality rate of 4.6% for resections that involved a lobectomy or more. The median hospital stay was 12 days and only 9% of patients were admitted to the intensive care unit. The 5-year survival rate is 38%, with a median survival duration of 46 months. By univariate analysis, nodal status of the primary lesion, short disease-free interval before detection of liver metastases, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level greater than 200 ng/mL, multiple liver tumors, extrahepatic disease, large tumors, or positive resection margin was predictive of poorer outcome. Sex, age greater than 70 years, site of primary tumor, or perioperative transfusion was not predictive of outcome. By multivariate analysis, positive margin, size greater than 10 cm, disease-free interval less than 12 months, multiple tumors, and extrahepatic disease were independent predictors of poorer outcome. Short disease-free interval or multiple tumors were nevertheless associated with a 5-year survival rate greater than 24%. CONCLUSION: Liver resection for colorectal metastases is safe and effective therapy and currently represents the only potentially curative therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. The only absolute contraindication to resection is extrahepatic disease. A randomized trial to examine efficacy of surgical resection cannot ethically be performed. Liver resection should be considered standard therapy for all fit patients with colorectal metastases isolated to the liver.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Watanabe, T., Muro, K., Ajioka, Y., Hashiguchi, Y., Ito, Y., Saito, Y., Hamaguchi, T., Ishida, H., Ishiguro, M., et al. (2018) · International Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s10147-017-1101-6 · Cited by 2,467
Hashiguchi, Y., Muro, K., Saito, Y., Ito, Y., Ajioka, Y., Hamaguchi, T., Hasegawa, K., Hotta, K., Ishida, H., Ishiguro, M., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s10147-019-01485-z · Cited by 1,922
Resection of colorectal liver metastases
Scheele, J., Stang, R., Altendorf‐Hofmann, A., & Paul, M. (1995) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/bf00316981 · Cited by 1,539
Mitry, E., Fields, A. L. A., Bleiberg, H., Labianca, R., Portier, G., Tu, D., Nitti, D., Torri, V., Elias, D., O'Callaghan, C., et al. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.17.3781 · Cited by 583
Leonard, G. D., Brenner, B., & Kemeny, N. E. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.00.349 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Fong, Y., Cohen, A. M., Fortner, J. G., Enker, W. E., Turnbull, A. D., Coit, D. G., Marrero, A. M., Prasad, M., Blumgart, L. H., & Brennan, M. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 938-946
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2125551462
- Cited by
- 1,284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver resection for colorectal metastases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.938
- The paper
- Fong, Y., Cohen, A. M., Fortner, J. G., Enker, W. E., Turnbull, A. D., Coit, D. G., Marrero, A. M., Prasad, M., Blumgart, L. H., & Brennan, M. F. (1997). Liver resection for colorectal metastases. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1997.15.3.938
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.