The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support for breast cancer in North America.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify trends in high-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support (autotransplants) for breast cancer (1989 to 1995). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analysis of patients who received autotransplants and were reported to the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry. Between January 1, 1989 and June 30, 1995, 19,291 autotransplants were reviewed; 5,886 were for breast cancer. Main outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and survival. RESULTS: Between 1989 and 1995, autotransplants for breast cancer increased sixfold. After 1992, breast cancer was the most common indication for autotransplant. Significant trends included increasing use for locally advanced rather than metastatic disease (P < .00001) and use of blood-derived rather than marrow-derived stem cells (P < .00001). One-hundred-day mortality decreased from 22% to 5% (P < .0001). Three-year PFS probabilities were 65% (95% confidence intervals [Cls], 59 to 71) for stage 2 disease, and 60% (95% Cl, 53 to 67) for stage 3 disease. In metastatic breast cancer, 3-year probabilities of PFS were 7% (95% Cl, 4 to 10) for women with no response to conventional dose chemotherapy; 13% (95% Cl, 9 to 17) for those with partial response; and 32% (95% Cl, 27 to 37) for those with complete response. Eleven percent of women with stage 2/3 disease and less than 1% of those with stage 4 disease participated in national cooperative group randomized trials. CONCLUSION: Autotransplants increasingly are used to treat breast cancer. One-hundred-day mortality has decreased substantially. Three-year survival is better in women with earlier stage disease and in those who respond to pretransplant chemotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 · Cited by 13,912
Cited by
Bergh, J., Wiklund, T., Erikstein, B., Lidbrink, E., Lindman, H., Malmström, P., Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P., Bengtsson, N.-O., Söderlund, G., Anker, G., et al. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02841-5 · Cited by 339
Cooley, S., Burns, L. J., Repka, T., & Miller, J. S. (1999) · Experimental Hematology · doi:10.1016/s0301-472x(99)00089-2 · Cited by 213
Metadata
- Authors
- Antman, K. H., Rowlings, P. A., Vaughan, W. P., Pelz, C. J., Fay, J. W., Fields, K. K., Freytes, C. O., Gale, R. P., Hillner, B. E., Holland, H. K., Kennedy, M. J., Klein, J. P., Lazarus, H. M., McCarthy, P. L., Saez, R., Spitzer, G., Stadtmauer, E. A., Williams, S. F., Wolff, S., Sobocinski, K. A., Armitage, J. O., & Horowitz, M. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1870-1879
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1942361359
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support for breast cancer in North America. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1997.15.5.1870
- The paper
- Antman, K. H., Rowlings, P. A., Vaughan, W. P., Pelz, C. J., Fay, J. W., Fields, K. K., Freytes, C. O., Gale, R. P., Hillner, B. E., Holland, H. K., Kennedy, M. J., Klein, J. P., Lazarus, H. M., McCarthy, P. L., Saez, R., Spitzer, G., Stadtmauer, E. A., Williams, S. F., Wolff, S., . . . Horowitz, M. M. (1997). High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support for breast cancer in North America. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1997.15.5.1870
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.