The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the objective tumor response rate and toxicities of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma treated with irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 121 patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma--90 with prior fluorouracil (5-FU) exposure and 31 chemotherapeutically naive patients--were enrolled between May 1993 and June 1994. Patients were treated with CPT-11 at 125 mg/m2 intravenously weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest. RESULTS: Among 90 patients with prior 5-FU chemotherapy, 12 partial responses were observed (response rate, 13.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1% to 22.1%). Among 31 chemotherapy-naive patients, eight had partial responses (response rate, 25.8%; 95% CI, 11.9% to 44.6%). The median response duration as measured from time of initial treatment for the two groups was 7.7 months and 7.6 months, respectively. The major adverse reactions were gastrointestinal and hematologic. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea was 36.4%, while the overall incidence of grade 3 or 4 leukopenia was 21.5% of patients. Only four of 121 patients (3.3%) developed neutropenic fever (grade 4 neutropenia with > or = grade 2 fever). The incidence of grade 4 leukopenia was higher in patients with prior pelvic radiotherapy (chi2 test P = .04), while the incidence of grade 3 or 4 diarrhea demonstrated no association with previous pelvic irradiation. CONCLUSION: According to the study design, CPT-11 showed promising activity in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma and modest activity in patients with prior 5-FU exposure. The toxicity with this schedule appears manageable with appropriate dose modification for individual patient tolerance and an intensive loperamide regimen for the management of diarrhea. Care should be taken when treating patients with prior pelvic radiotherapy because of the increased risk of neutropenia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cunningham, D., Pyrhönen, S., James, R. D., Punt, C. J., Hickish, T. F., Heikkila, R., Johannesen, T. B., Starkhammar, H., Topham, C. A., Awad, L., et al. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)02309-5 · Cited by 1,259
Rougier, P., Van Cutsem, E., Bajetta, E., Niederle, N., Possinger, K., Labianca, R., Navarro, M., Morant, R., Bleiberg, H., Wils, J., et al. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)03085-2 · Cited by 992
Köhne, C.-H., van Cutsem, E., Wils, J., Bokemeyer, C., El-Serafi, M., Lutz, M. P., Lorenz, M., Reichardt, P., Rückle-Lanz, H., Frickhofen, N., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.546 · Cited by 331
André, T., Bensmaine, M. A., Louvet, C., François, E., Lucas, V., Desseigne, F., Beerblock, K., Bouché, O., Carola, E., Merrouche, Y., et al. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.11.3560 · Cited by 277
Marine organisms and other novel natural sources of new cancer drugs
Schwartsmann, G. (2000) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/11.suppl_3.235 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Pitot, H. C., Wender, D. B., O'Connell, M. J., Schroeder, G., Goldberg, R. M., Rubin, J., Mailliard, J. A., Knost, J. A., Ghosh, C., Kirschling, R. J., Levitt, R., & Windschitl, H. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2910-2919
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W181158363
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2910
- The paper
- Pitot, H. C., Wender, D. B., O'Connell, M. J., Schroeder, G., Goldberg, R. M., Rubin, J., Mailliard, J. A., Knost, J. A., Ghosh, C., Kirschling, R. J., Levitt, R., & Windschitl, H. E. (1997). Phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2910
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.