Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prospectively randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk colon cancer.

O'Connell, M J, Laurie, J A, Kahn, M, Fitzgibbons, R J, Erlichman, C, Shepherd, L, Moertel, C G, Kocha, W I, Pazdur, R, Wieand, H S, Rubin, J, Vukov, A M, Donohue, J H, Krook, J E, Figueredo, A·1998·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study had two major goals: (1) to assess the effectiveness of a regimen of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus levamisole plus leucovorin as postoperative surgical adjuvant therapy for patients with high-risk colon cancer, and (2) to evaluate 6 months versus 12 months of chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with poor-prognosis stage II or III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with either intensive-course 5-FU and leucovorin combined with levamisole, or a standard regimen of 5-FU plus levamisole. Patients were also randomly assigned to receive either 12 months or 6 months of chemotherapy, which resulted in four treatment groups. RESULTS: Eight hundred ninety-one of 915 patients entered (97.4%) were eligible. The median follow-up duration is 5.1 years for patients still alive. There was a difference among the four treatment groups with respect to patient survival, and a significant duration-by-regimen interaction was observed. Specifically, standard 5-FU plus levamisole was inferior to 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole when treatment was given for 6 months (5-year survival rate, 60% v 70%; P < .01). CONCLUSION: There was no significant improvement in patient survival when chemotherapy was given for 12 months compared with 6 months. When chemotherapy was given for 6 months, standard 5-FU plus levamisole was associated with inferior patient survival compared with intensive-course 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole. These data suggest that 5-FU plus levamisole for 6 months should not be used in clinical practice, whereas 6 months of treatment with 5-FU plus leucovorin plus levamisole is effective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1998.16.1.295

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
O'Connell, M. J., Laurie, J. A., Kahn, M., Fitzgibbons, R. J., Erlichman, C., Shepherd, L., Moertel, C. G., Kocha, W. I., Pazdur, R., Wieand, H. S., Rubin, J., Vukov, A. M., Donohue, J. H., Krook, J. E., & Figueredo, A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1998-01
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
295-300
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1958418663
Cited by
417
References
1
FWCI
7.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospectively randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk colon cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.1.295
The paper
O'Connell, M. J., Laurie, J. A., Kahn, M., Fitzgibbons, R. J., Erlichman, C., Shepherd, L., Moertel, C. G., Kocha, W. I., Pazdur, R., Wieand, H. S., Rubin, J., Vukov, A. M., Donohue, J. H., Krook, J. E., & Figueredo, A. (1998). Prospectively randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk colon cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.1.295

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.