The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ERCC1 mRNA levels complement thymidylate synthase mRNA levels in predicting response and survival for gastric cancer patients receiving combination cisplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We have previously shown that relative thymidylate synthase (TS) mRNA levels in primary gastric adenocarcinomas treated with fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin are inversely associated with response and survival. This is a presumed function of TS as a target for 5-FU activity. We now test the hypotheses that the relative mRNA level of the excision repair cross-complementing (ERCC1) gene is inversely associated with response and survival as an independent function of cisplatin efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had intact, untreated, primary gastric adenocarcinoma cancer and were evaluated for eligibility on a preoperative cisplatin infusion-5-FU protocol. cDNA, derived from primary gastric tumors before chemotherapy, was used to determine ERCC1 mRNA levels, expressed as the ratio of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product of the ERCC1 gene and the beta-actin gene. RESULTS: The median ERCC1 mRNA level from 38 primary gastric cancers (33 assessable for response) was 5.8 x 10(-3) (range, 1.8 x 10(-3) to 19.5 x 10(-3)). Of 17 responding patients, 13 (76%) were less than or equal to 5.8 x 10(-3) and four were greater than 5.8 x 10(-3) (P = .003). The median survival for patients with ERCC1 mRNA levels less than or equal to 5.8 x 10(-3) has not been reached, whereas for those greater than 5.8 x 10(-3) it was 5.4 months (P = .034). The median TS mRNA level, 3.7 x 10(-3) (range, 0.9 to 18.9) also segregated responsive versus resistant tumors (P = .024). With both ERCC1 and TS mRNA levels below their medians, 11 of 13 patients (85%) responded; with both ERCC1 and TS mRNA levels above their medians, two of 10 patients (20%) responded (P = .003). CONCLUSION: Considered separately, either ERCC1 or TS mRNA levels in a primary gastric adenocarcinoma has a statistically significant relationship to response. ERCC1 mRNA levels have a statistically significant association with survival; in this cohort TS mRNA levels did not reach statistically significant association with survival as in our previous publication. Whether these molecular parameters are independent of each other as predictors of outcome remains to be determined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular mechanisms of cisplatin resistance
Galluzzi, L., Senovilla, L., Vitale, I., Michels, J., Martins, I., Kepp, O., Castedo, M., & Kroemer, G. (2012) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2011.384 · Cited by 2,760
Systems biology of cisplatin resistance: past, present and future
Galluzzi, L., Vitale, I., Michels, J., Brenner, C., Szabadkai, G., Harel-Bellan, A., Castedo, M., & Kroemer, G. (2014) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2013.428 · Cited by 782
MAST1 drives cisplatin resistance in human cancers by rewiring cRaf-independent MEK activation
Jin, L., Chun, J., Pan, C., Li, D., Lin, R., Alesi, G. N., Wang, X., Kang, H.-B., Song, L., Wang, D., et al. (2018) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2018.06.012 · Cited by 132
Langer, R., Specht, K., Becker, K., Ewald, P., Bekesch, M., Sarbia, M., Busch, R., Feith, M., Stein, H. J., Siewert, J.-R., et al. (2005) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-0042 · Cited by 70
The design, analysis and application of mouse clinical trials in oncology drug development
Guo, S., Jiang, X., Mao, B., & Li, Q.-X. (2019) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-019-5907-7 · Cited by 68
Wang, X., Yan, S., Dai, W., Liu, X., Zhang, W., & Wang, J. (2010) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.25294 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Metzger, R., Leichman, C. G., Danenberg, K. D., Danenberg, P. V., Lenz, H. J., Hayashi, K., Groshen, S., Salonga, D., Cohen, H., Laine, L., Crookes, P., Silberman, H., Baranda, J., Konda, B., & Leichman, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 309-316
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1802949207
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.