The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cardiac effects of adjuvant doxorubicin and radiation therapy in breast cancer patients.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the cardiac effects of two different cumulative doses of adjuvant doxorubicin and radiation therapy (RT) in breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred ninety-nine breast cancer patients were prospectively randomized to receive either five cycles (CA5) or 10 cycles (CA10) of adjuvant treatment with cyclophosphamide (500 mg/ m2) and doxorubicin (45 mg/m2) administered by intravenous bolus every 21 days. One hundred twenty-two of these patients also received RT. Estimates of the cardiac RT dose-volume were retrospectively categorized as low, moderate, or high. The risk of major cardiac events (congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction) was assessable in 276 patients (92%), with a median follow-up time of 6.0 years (range, 0.5 to 19.4). RESULTS: The estimated risk (95% confidence interval) of cardiac events per 100 patient-years was significantly higher for CA10 than for CA5 [1.7 (1.0 to 2.8) v 0.5 (0.1 to 1.2); P=.02]. The risk of cardiac events in CA5 patients, irrespective of the cardiac RT dose-volume, did not differ significantly from rates of cardiac events predicted for the general female population by the Framingham Heart Study. In CA10 patients, the incidence of cardiac events was significantly increased (relative risk ratio, 3.6; P < .00003) compared with the Framingham population, particularly in groups that also received moderate and high dose-volume cardiac RT. CONCLUSION: Conventional-dose adjuvant doxorubicin as delivered in the CA5 regimen by itself, or in combination with locoregional RT, was not associated with a significant increase in the risk of cardiac events. Higher doses of adjuvant doxorubicin (CA10) were associated with a threefold to fourfold increased risk of cardiac events. This appears to be especially true in patients treated with higher dose-volumes of cardiac RT. Larger studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS, Hunt, S. A., Abraham, W. T., Chin, M. H., Feldman, A. M., Francis, G. S., Ganiats, T. G., Jessup, M., Konstam, M. A., Mancini, D. M., et al. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.167586 · Cited by 2,251
Models for Delivering Survivorship Care
Oeffinger, K. C., & McCabe, M. S. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.07.0474 · Cited by 485
Thorsen, L. B. J., Offersen, B. V., Danø, H., Berg, M., Jensen, I., Pedersen, A. N., Zimmermann, S. J., Brodersen, H.-J., Overgaard, M., & Overgaard, J. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.6456 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Shapiro, C. L., Hardenbergh, P. H., Gelman, R., Blanks, D., Hauptman, P., Recht, A., Hayes, D. F., Harris, J., & Henderson, I. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3493-3501
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2136867800
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cardiac effects of adjuvant doxorubicin and radiation therapy in breast cancer patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.11.3493
- The paper
- Shapiro, C. L., Hardenbergh, P. H., Gelman, R., Blanks, D., Hauptman, P., Recht, A., Hayes, D. F., Harris, J., & Henderson, I. C. (1998). Cardiac effects of adjuvant doxorubicin and radiation therapy in breast cancer patients. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.11.3493
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.