The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prognostic and predictive value of c-erbB-2 overexpression in primary breast cancer, alone and in combination with other prognostic markers.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic and predictive value of c-erbB-2 overexpression in breast cancer in relation to other prognostic markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paraffin-embedded tumors from 315 consecutive primary breast cancer patients were screened for c-erbB-2 protein (p185) overexpression by immunohistochemistry using the monoclonal antibody CB11. RESULTS: c-erbB-2 protein overexpression was detected in 19% of tumors and was associated with shorter 5-year overall survival (OAS) rate compared with c-erbB-2-negative cases in the total patient material (58% and 77%, respectively; P = .004) and in the 96 node-positive patients (31% and 61%, respectively; P = .02), but not in node-negative patients. For 47 node-positive patients treated with adjuvant tamoxifen and radiotherapy, the 5-year OAS was 13% for c-erbB-2 overexpression and 75% for c-erbB-2-negative patients (P = .00004). The frequency of c-erbB-2 overexpression decreased with age at diagnosis. The prognostic value of c-erbB-2 on OAS was independent of age, node status, tumor size, histopathologic grade, hormone receptor status, S phase, p53 status, and adjuvant treatment. c-erbB-2 status added prognostic information to p53-negative and low S-phase cases, but not to p53-positive and high S-phase cases. Correspondingly, these only added information to c-erbB-2-negative cases. CONCLUSION: c-erbB-2 protein overexpression may have a predictive value with regard to adjuvant therapy in node-positive patients, for whom adjuvant tamoxifen with radiotherapy appears insufficient in the presence of c-erbB-2 overexpression. Combination of conventional and newer tumor markers may identify patients with a worse prognosis within groups with a generally favorable prognosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Perez, E. A., Romond, E. H., Suman, V. J., Jeong, J.-H., Davidson, N. E., Geyer, C. E., Martino, S., Mamounas, E. P., Kaufman, P. A., & Wolmark, N. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.35.0868 · Cited by 717
The ErbB receptors and their role in cancer progression
Holbro, T. (2003) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1016/s0014-4827(02)00099-x · Cited by 608
HER2-amplified breast cancer: mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance and novel targeted therapies
Gajria, D., & Chandarlapaty, S. (2011) · Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy · doi:10.1586/era.10.226 · Cited by 494
LoRusso, P. M., Weiss, D., Guardino, E., Girish, S., & Sliwkowski, M. X. (2011) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-0762 · Cited by 444
Jordan, V. C. (2003) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm020450x · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Sjögren, S., Inganäs, M., Lindgren, A., Holmberg, L., & Bergh, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 462-469
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2101577390
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic and predictive value of c-erbB-2 overexpression in primary breast cancer, alone and in combination with other prognostic markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.2.462
- The paper
- Sjögren, S., Inganäs, M., Lindgren, A., Holmberg, L., & Bergh, J. (1998). Prognostic and predictive value of c-erbB-2 overexpression in primary breast cancer, alone and in combination with other prognostic markers. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.2.462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.