Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 441

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer. Toronto Breast Cancer Study Group.

Andrulis, I L, Bull, S B, Blackstein, M E, Sutherland, D, Mak, C, Sidlofsky, S, Pritzker, K P, Hartwick, R W, Hanna, W, Lickley, L, Wilkinson, R, Qizilbash, A, Ambus, U, Lipa, M, Weizel, H, Katz, A, Baida, M, Mariz, S, Stoik, G, Dacamara, P, Strongitharm, D, Geddie, W, McCready, D·1998·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: It remains a challenge to predict which women with axillary node-negative (ANN) breast cancer at greatest risk of relapse may benefit most from adjuvant therapy. Increases in neu/erbB-2 have been implicated in breast cancer prognosis. Although overexpression has been investigated extensively, this study represents the first prospective assessment of the prognostic value of neu/erbB-2 DNA amplification in a cohort of women with newly diagnosed ANN. METHODS: A consecutive series of women was monitored for recurrence (median follow-up duration, 36 months) and tumors from 580 individuals were analyzed for amplification. The association of amplification with risk of recurrence was examined in survival analyses with traditional and histologic markers as prognostic factors. RESULTS: Neu/erbB-2 was amplified in 20% of cases. We found an increased risk of disease recurrence when neu/erbB-2 was amplified > or = twofold that persisted with adjustment for other prognostic factors (relative risk, 2.36; P = .002). We found some evidence that amplification was more important in patients who received chemotherapy compared with untreated patients. CONCLUSION: neu/erbB-2 amplification is an independent prognostic factor for risk of recurrence in ANN breast cancer. Women with tumors without neu/erbB-2 amplification have a good prognosis; aggressive therapy in this group is therefore difficult to justify. On the other hand, even with adjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment, women whose tumors exhibit neu/erbB-2 amplification have an increased risk of recurrence. We encourage a randomized trial to compare more aggressive adjuvant chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy for ANN women whose tumors exhibit neu/erbB-2 amplification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1998.16.4.1340

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Cited by

See all 441

Metadata

Authors
Andrulis, I. L., Bull, S. B., Blackstein, M. E., Sutherland, D., Mak, C., Sidlofsky, S., Pritzker, K. P., Hartwick, R. W., Hanna, W., Lickley, L., Wilkinson, R., Qizilbash, A., Ambus, U., Lipa, M., Weizel, H., Katz, A., Baida, M., Mariz, S., Stoik, G., Dacamara, P., Strongitharm, D., Geddie, W., & McCready, D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1998-04
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
1340-1349
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2110442763
Cited by
441
References
25
FWCI
10.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer. Toronto Breast Cancer Study Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.4.1340
The paper
Andrulis, I. L., Bull, S. B., Blackstein, M. E., Sutherland, D., Mak, C., Sidlofsky, S., Pritzker, K. P., Hartwick, R. W., Hanna, W., Lickley, L., Wilkinson, R., Qizilbash, A., Ambus, U., Lipa, M., Weizel, H., Katz, A., Baida, M., Mariz, S., Stoik, G., . . . McCready, D. (1998). neu/erbB-2 amplification identifies a poor-prognosis group of women with node-negative breast cancer. Toronto Breast Cancer Study Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.4.1340

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.