The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Monoclonal antibody therapy for resected Dukes' C colorectal cancer: seven-year outcome of a multicenter randomized trial.
Abstract
PURPOSE: As previously shown, antibody treatment increased survival of patients with resected colorectal cancer of stage Dukes' C. Since the 5-year analysis was criticized because of the wide range (2.7 to 7.5 years) of follow-up time, we performed a 7-year analysis with only four of 189 patients monitored for less than 5 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 189 patients with resected Dukes' C colorectal cancer were randomly allocated to infusions of a total of 900 mg 17-1A antibody, 500 mg postoperatively followed by 4 monthly doses of 100 mg (n=99), or to observation only (n=90). Primary end points were overall survival and disease-free interval. Patients were stratified by a dynamic randomization according to center, sex, location of tumor, number of affected lymph nodes, and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen concentration. RESULTS: Randomization produced balanced distribution of risk factors. After 7 years of follow-up evaluation, treatment had reduced overall mortality by 32% (Cox's proportional hazard, P < .01; log-rank, P=.01) and decreased the recurrence rate by 23% (Cox's proportional hazard, P < .04; log-rank, P=.07). The intention-to-treat analysis gave a significant effect for overall survival (Cox's proportional hazard, P < .01; log-rank, P=.02) and disease-free survival (Cox's proportional hazard, P=.02; log-rank, P=.11 ). While distant metastases were significantly reduced (Cox's proportional hazard, P=.004; log-rank, P=.004), local relapses were not (Cox's proportional hazard, P=.65; log-rank, P=.52). This differential effect of 17-1A antibody on disseminated isolated tumor cells versus occult local satellites may explain the increased significance seen in the overall survival. CONCLUSION: The now-matured study shows that 17-1A antibody administered after surgery prevents the development of distant metastasis in approximately one third of patients. The therapeutic effect is maintained after 7 years of follow-up evaluation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EpCAM (CD326) finding its role in cancer
Baeuerle, P. A., & Gires, O. (2007) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603494 · Cited by 527
Zeidler, R., Reisbach, G., Wollenberg, B., Lang, S., Chaubal, S., Schmitt, B., & Lindhofer, H. (1999) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.163.3.1246 · Cited by 204
Zhang, B.-L., Li, D., Gong, Y.-L., Huang, Y., Qin, D.-Y., Jiang, L., Liang, X., Yang, X., Gou, H.-F., Wang, Y.-S., et al. (2019) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/hum.2018.229 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Riethmüller, G., Holz, E., Schlimok, G., Schmiegel, W., Raab, R., Höffken, K., Gruber, R., Funke, I., Pichlmaier, H., Hirche, H., Buggisch, P., Witte, J., & Pichlmayr, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1788-1794
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2100321869
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monoclonal antibody therapy for resected Dukes' C colorectal cancer: seven-year outcome of a multicenter randomized trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.5.1788
- The paper
- Riethmüller, G., Holz, E., Schlimok, G., Schmiegel, W., Raab, R., Höffken, K., Gruber, R., Funke, I., Pichlmaier, H., Hirche, H., Buggisch, P., Witte, J., & Pichlmayr, R. (1998). Monoclonal antibody therapy for resected Dukes' C colorectal cancer: seven-year outcome of a multicenter randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.5.1788
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.