The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the relative efficacy of an intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) adjuvant chemotherapy regimen compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer were randomly allocated to receive either cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 through 14; methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8 or cyclophosphomide 75 mg/m2 orally days 1 through 14; epirubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8; and fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8. Each cycle was administered monthly for 6 months. Patients administered CEF received antibiotic prophylaxis with cotrimoxazole two tablets twice a day for the duration of chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 59 months. One hundred sixty-nine of the 359 CMF patients developed recurrence compared with 132 of the 351 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year relapse-free survival rates were 53% and 63%, respectively (P = .009). One hundred seven CMF patients died compared with 85 CEF patients. The corresponding 5-year actuarial survival rates were 70% and 77%, respectively (P = .03). The rate of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia was 1.1% in the CMF group compared with 8.5% in the CEF group. There was one case of congestive heart failure in a patient who received CMF compared with none in the CEF group. Acute leukemia occurred in five patients in the CEF group. CONCLUSION: The results of this trial show the superiority of CEF over CMF in terms of both disease-free and overall survival in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plosker, G. L., & Faulds, D. (1993) · Drugs · doi:10.2165/00003495-199345050-00011 · Cited by 223
Cited by
(2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.13.979 · Cited by 893
Bodai, B. I., & Tuso, P. (2015) · The Permanente Journal · doi:10.7812/tpp/14-241 · Cited by 397
Meeting Highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer
Goldhirsch, A., Glick, J. H., Gelber, R. D., & Senn, H.-J. (1998) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/90.21.1601 · Cited by 380
Lohrisch, C., Paltiel, C., Gelmon, K., Speers, C., Taylor, S., Barnett, J., & Olivotto, I. A. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.01.6089 · Cited by 373
Bergh, J., Wiklund, T., Erikstein, B., Lidbrink, E., Lindman, H., Malmström, P., Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P., Bengtsson, N.-O., Söderlund, G., Anker, G., et al. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02841-5 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Levine, M. N., Bramwell, V. H., Pritchard, K. I., Norris, B. D., Shepherd, L. E., Abu-Zahra, H., Findlay, B., Warr, D., Bowman, D., Myles, J., Arnold, A., Vandenberg, T., MacKenzie, R., Robert, J., Ottaway, J., Burnell, M., Williams, C. K., & Tu, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2651-2658
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1848579801
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1998.16.8.2651
- The paper
- Levine, M. N., Bramwell, V. H., Pritchard, K. I., Norris, B. D., Shepherd, L. E., Abu-Zahra, H., Findlay, B., Warr, D., Bowman, D., Myles, J., Arnold, A., Vandenberg, T., MacKenzie, R., Robert, J., Ottaway, J., Burnell, M., Williams, C. K., & Tu, D. (1998). Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1998.16.8.2651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.