The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Treatment for Malignant Mesothelioma: A Phase II Study
Abstract
PURPOSE: We performed a phase II study of combined cisplatin 100 mg/m 2, given intravenously on day 1, and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2, given intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle for six cycles among patients with advanced measurable pleural mesothelioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pleural tumor was measured at three levels on computed tomographic scans at study entry and before the second, fourth, and sixth cycles and every 2 months thereafter to disease progression. Of the 21 patients treated, 19 were male; the median age was 62 years (range, 46 to 74 years); 62% had epithelial tumors; and 18 were classified as tumor-node-metastasis system stage III or IV. Ninety-four cycles were given (median, six; mean, 4.5 per patient), with a mean relative dose intensity of cisplatin 96.7% and gemcitabine 82.5%. RESULTS: Best objective responses achieved were as follows: complete response, no patients; partial response, 10 patients (complete response + partial response, 47.6% [95% confidence interval, 26.2% to 69.0%]); no change, nine patients; and progressive disease, two patients. Median response duration was 25 weeks, progression-free survival was 25 weeks, and overall survival was 41 weeks. Nine of the 10 responders (90%) and three of nine patients with no change had significant symptom improvement. Serial measurements of vital capacity were performed on three of the responders; all showed a significant increase during the time of remission. Toxicity was mainly gastroenterologic and hematologic. Grade 3 nausea and vomiting occurred in 33% of patients, grade 3 leukopenia in 38%, grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 14%, and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 19%. CONCLUSION: Combined cisplatin and gemcitabine is an active combination in malignant mesothelioma and produces symptomatic benefit in responding patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vogelzang, N. J., Rusthoven, J. J., Symanowski, J., Denham, C., Kaukel, E., Ruffie, P., Gatzemeier, U., Boyer, M., Emri, S., Manegold, C., et al. (2003) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2003.11.136 · Cited by 3,060
(2001) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/93.13.979 · Cited by 893
Advances in Malignant Mesothelioma
Robinson, B. W. S., & Lake, R. A. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra050152 · Cited by 889
Self-citationKindler, H. L., Ismaila, N., Armato, S. G., Bueno, R., Hesdorffer, M., Jahan, T., Jones, C. M., Miettinen, M., Pass, H., Rimner, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2017.76.6394 · Cited by 420
Weder, W., Stahel, R. A., Bernhard, J., Bodis, S., Vogt, P., Ballabeni, P., Lardinois, D., Betticher, D., Schmid, R., Stupp, R., et al. (2007) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm093 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Byrne, M. J., Davidson, J. A., Musk, A. W., Dewar, J., van Hazel, G., Buck, M., de Klerk, N. H., & Robinson, B. W. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-25
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2163456861
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Treatment for Malignant Mesothelioma: A Phase II Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1999.17.1.25
- The paper
- Byrne, M. J., Davidson, J. A., Musk, A. W., Dewar, J., van Hazel, G., Buck, M., de Klerk, N. H., & Robinson, B. W. S. (1999). Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Treatment for Malignant Mesothelioma: A Phase II Study. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.1.25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.