Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 493

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Trial to Assess the Relative Efficacy of Fluorouracil and Leucovorin, Fluorouracil and Levamisole, and Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Levamisole in Patients With Dukes' B and C Carcinoma of the Colon: Results From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-04

Wolmark, Norman, Rockette, Howard, Mamounas, Eleftherios, Jones, Judy, Wieand, Sam, Wickerham, D.L., Bear, Harry D., Atkins, James N., Dimitrov, Nikolay V., Glass, Andrew G., Fisher, Edwin R., Fisher, Bernard·1999·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil (FU+LV) with that of fluorouracil and levamisole (FU+LEV) or with the combination of FU+LV and levamisole (FU+LV+LEV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1989 and December 1990, 2,151 patients with Dukes' B (stage II) and Dukes' C (stage III) carcinoma of the colon were entered onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowl Project protocol C-04. Patients were randomly assigned to receive FU+LV (weekly regimen), FU + LEV, or the combination of FU+LV+LEV. The average time on study was 86 months. RESULTS: A pairwise comparison between patients treated with FU+LV or FU+LEV disclosed a prolongation in disease-free survival (DFS) in favor of the FU+LV group (65% v 60%; P = .04); there was a small prolongation in overall survival that was of borderline significance (74% v 70%; P = .07). There was no difference in the pairwise comparison between patients who received FU+LV or FU+LV+LEV for either DFS (65% v 64%; P = .67) or overall survival (74% v 73%; P = .99). There was no interaction between Dukes' stage and the effect of treatment. CONCLUSION: In patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon, treatment with FU+LV seems to confer a small DFS advantage and a borderline prolongation in overall survival when compared with treatment with FU+LEV. The addition of LEV to FU+LV does not provide any additional benefit over and above that achieved with FU+LV. These findings support the use of adjuvant FU+LV as an acceptable therapeutic standard in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.1999.17.11.3553

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 493

Metadata

Authors
Wolmark, N., Rockette, H., Mamounas, E., Jones, J., Wieand, S., Wickerham, D. L., Bear, H. D., Atkins, J. N., Dimitrov, N. V., Glass, A. G., Fisher, E. R., & Fisher, B.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
1999-11
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
3553-3559
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1845706120
Cited by
493
References
3
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Trial to Assess the Relative Efficacy of Fluorouracil and Leucovorin, Fluorouracil and Levamisole, and Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Levamisole in Patients With Dukes' B and C Carcinoma of the Colon: Results From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-04. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.1999.17.11.3553
The paper
Wolmark, N., Rockette, H., Mamounas, E., Jones, J., Wieand, S., Wickerham, D. L., Bear, H. D., Atkins, J. N., Dimitrov, N. V., Glass, A. G., Fisher, E. R., & Fisher, B. (1999). Clinical Trial to Assess the Relative Efficacy of Fluorouracil and Leucovorin, Fluorouracil and Levamisole, and Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Levamisole in Patients With Dukes' B and C Carcinoma of the Colon: Results From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-04. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.1999.17.11.3553

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.