The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tumor Hypoxia Has Independent Predictor Impact Only in Patients With Node-Negative Cervix Cancer
Abstract
PURPOSE: This prospective clinical study was begun in 1994 to validate the independent prognostic impact of tumor hypoxia in patients with cervix cancer treated with definitive radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 1994 and January 1999, 106 eligible patients with epithelial cervix cancer had tumor oxygen pressure (PO(2)) measured using the Eppendorf probe. Oxygenation data are presented as the hypoxic proportion, defined as the percentage of PO(2) readings less than 5 mm/Hg (abbreviated as HP(5)) and the median PO(2). RESULTS: The median HP(5) in individual patients was 48%, and the median PO(2) was HP(5). Progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with hypoxic tumors (HP(5) > 50%) was 37% at 3 years versus 67% in those patients with better oxygenated tumors (P =.004). In multivariate analysis, only tumor size (risk ratio [RR], 1.33; P =.0003) and evidence of pelvic nodal metastases on imaging studies (RR, 2.52; P =.0065) were predictive of PFS. However, an interaction between nodal status and oxygenation was observed (P =.006), and further analysis indicated that HP(5) was an independent predictor of outcome in patients with negative nodes on imaging (P =.007). There was a significant increase in the 3-year cumulative incidence of distant metastases in the hypoxic group (41% v 15% in those with HP(5) < 50%; P =.0023), but not in pelvic relapse (37% v 27%; P =.12). CONCLUSION: Tumor hypoxia is an independent predictor of poor PFS only in patients with node-negative cervix cancer, in addition to tumor size. Its impact appears to be related to an increased risk of distant metastases rather than to an effect on pelvic control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hypoxia-mediated selection of cells with diminished apoptotic potential in solid tumours
Graeber, T. G., Osmanian, C., Jacks, T., Housman, D. E., Koch, C. J., Lowe, S. W., & Giaccia, A. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379088a0 · Cited by 2,300
Cited by
Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome
Vaupel, P., & Mayer, A. (2007) · Cancer and Metastasis Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10555-007-9055-1 · Cited by 2,240
Drug Resistance and the Solid Tumor Microenvironment
Tredan, O., Galmarini, C. M., Patel, K., & Tannock, I. F. (2007) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djm135 · Cited by 2,116
Detection and Characterization of Tumor Hypoxia Using pO 2 Histography
Vaupel, P., Höckel, M., & Mayer, A. (2007) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2007.1628 · Cited by 728
Eschrich, S. A., Pramana, J., Zhang, H., Zhao, H., Boulware, D., Lee, J.-H., Bloom, G., Rocha-Lima, C., Kelley, S., Calvin, D. P., et al. (2009) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.014 · Cited by 360
The hypoxic tumour microenvironment and metastatic progression
Subarsky, P., & Hill, R. P. (2003) · Clinical & Experimental Metastasis · doi:10.1023/a:1022939318102 · Cited by 327
Metadata
- Authors
- Fyles, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 680-687
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2033221360
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tumor Hypoxia Has Independent Predictor Impact Only in Patients With Node-Negative Cervix Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.20.3.680
- The paper
- Fyles, A. (2002). Tumor Hypoxia Has Independent Predictor Impact Only in Patients With Node-Negative Cervix Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.20.3.680
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.