The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Rituximab and CHOP Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Mantle-Cell Lymphoma: Molecular Complete Responses Are Not Predictive of Progression-Free Survival
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) induction therapy in patients with newly diagnosed mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1997 to May 1999, 40 previously untreated patients with stage II through IV MCL were treated with six cycles of rituximab and CHOP chemotherapy in a phase II trial. Pretreatment and interval peripheral-blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) specimens were also analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for tumor-specific BCL-1/immunoglobulin H (IgH) translocations and clonal IgH rearrangements. Study end points included clinical and molecular response rates and long-term progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Forty-eight percent of patients achieved a complete response (CR)/CR unconfirmed (CRu), and 48% of patients obtained a partial response (PR). However, 28 of the 40 patients have already relapsed or developed progressive disease with a median PFS of 16.6 months. Twenty-five patients had PCR-detectable BCL-1/IgH or clonal IgH products in PB or BM at diagnosis. Nine of the 25 informative patients had no evidence of PCR-detectable disease in PB or BM after rituximab and CHOP therapy. However, patients who achieved molecular remissions in PB or BM had PFS similar to patients without molecular remissions (16.5 v 18.8 months, P =.51). CONCLUSION: Favorable clinical and molecular response rates associated with rituximab and CHOP chemotherapy do not translate into prolonged PFS in MCL. Nevertheless, rituximab and combination chemotherapy may transiently clear PB or BM of detectable tumor cells, prompting additional consideration of antibody-based in vivo purging in subsequent clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Till, B. G., Jensen, M. C., Wang, J., Chen, E. Y., Wood, B. L., Greisman, H. A., Qian, X., James, S. E., Raubitschek, A., Forman, S. J., et al. (2008) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2007-12-128843 · Cited by 722
Shankland, K. R., Armitage, J. O., & Hancock, B. W. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60605-9 · Cited by 641
Geisler, C. H., Kolstad, A., Laurell, A., Andersen, N. S., Pedersen, L. B., Jerkeman, M., Eriksson, M., Nordström, M., Kimby, E., Boesen, A. M., et al. (2008) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2008-03-147025 · Cited by 622
Forstpointner, R. (2004) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2004-04-1323 · Cited by 580
Goy, A., Younes, A., McLaughlin, P., Pro, B., Romaguera, J. E., Hagemeister, F., Fayad, L., Dang, N. H., Samaniego, F., Wang, M., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.03.108 · Cited by 526
Metadata
- Authors
- Howard, O. M., Gribben, J. G., Neuberg, D. S., Grossbard, M. L., Poor, C., Janicek, M. J., & Shipp, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Publisher
- Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Published
- 2002-03-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1288-1294
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996537666
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rituximab and CHOP Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Mantle-Cell Lymphoma: Molecular Complete Responses Are Not Predictive of Progression-Free Survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.20.5.1288
- The paper
- Howard, O. M., Gribben, J. G., Neuberg, D. S., Grossbard, M. L., Poor, C., Janicek, M. J., & Shipp, M. A. (2002). Rituximab and CHOP Induction Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Mantle-Cell Lymphoma: Molecular Complete Responses Are Not Predictive of Progression-Free Survival. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.20.5.1288
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.