Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 264

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized, Dose-Escalation Study of SD/01 Compared With Daily Filgrastim in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

Johnston, Eileen, Crawford, Jeffrey, Blackwell, Susan, Bjurstrom, Toni, Lockbaum, Pamela, Roskos, Lorin, Yang, Bing-Bing, Gardner, Sheila, Miller-Messana, Mary Ann, Shoemaker, Debra, Garst, Jennifer, Schwab, Gisela·2000·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the use of SD/01 (a polyethylene glycol–conjugated filgrastim shown in preclinical studies to have a prolonged half-life) in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with non–small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive daily filgrastim (5 μg/kg/d) or a single injection of SD/01 (30, 100, or 300 μg/kg) 2 weeks before chemotherapy and again 24 hours after administration of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety analyses were performed. RESULTS: Peak serum concentrations of SD/01 and the duration of increased serum concentrations were dependent on the SD/01 dose. SD/01 concentrations remained increased longer in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Prechemotherapy median absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) in patients receiving SD/01 were increased in a dose-dependent fashion, with the duration of this effect also being dose dependent. After chemotherapy, median ANC nadirs were similar in the filgrastim cohort and the cohort receiving SD/01 30 μg/kg, with higher nadirs seen in the cohorts receiving SD/01 100 or 300 μg/kg. Dose-limiting toxicities were not noted. CD34+ cells were mobilized in all cohorts. CONCLUSION: A single dose of SD/01 increases the serum concentration of SD/01 for several days in a dose-dependent fashion and is not associated with significant toxicity. The effects of SD/01 on ANC and CD34+ cell mobilization are comparable or greater than those achieved with daily filgrastim. The self-regulation of this molecule provides a potential therapeutic advantage in a variety of clinical settings associated with neutropenia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2000.18.13.2522

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 264

Metadata

Authors
Johnston, E., Crawford, J., Blackwell, S., Bjurstrom, T., Lockbaum, P., Roskos, L., Yang, B.-B., Gardner, S., Miller-Messana, M. A., Shoemaker, D., Garst, J., & Schwab, G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2000-07-01
Volume
18
Issue
13
Pages
2522-2528
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2269955197
Cited by
264
References
7
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized, Dose-Escalation Study of SD/01 Compared With Daily Filgrastim in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.13.2522
The paper
Johnston, E., Crawford, J., Blackwell, S., Bjurstrom, T., Lockbaum, P., Roskos, L., Yang, B.-B., Gardner, S., Miller-Messana, M. A., Shoemaker, D., Garst, J., & Schwab, G. (2000). Randomized, Dose-Escalation Study of SD/01 Compared With Daily Filgrastim in Patients Receiving Chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.13.2522

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.