The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of Methods for Tissue-Based Detection of the HER-2/neu Alteration in Human Breast Cancer: A Direct Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in detecting the HER-2/neu alteration in human breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Unselected stage I, II, and III breast cancer patients (N = 900) were tested for HER-2/neu gene amplification by FISH in paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed archival material. Of these samples, 856 were tested for HER-2/neu overexpression by non–antigen-retrieval IHC with the polyclonal antibody R60, the sensitivity and specificity of which was preliminarily compared with the United States Food and Drug Administration–approved HercepTest (Dako Corp, Carpinteria, CA). Patient survival was analyzed in relation to the presence of the HER-2/neu alteration as determined by these two methodologies. RESULTS: A total of 189 (21%) of 900 patients were positive by FISH and 147 (17.2%) of 856 were positive by IHC. This discrepancy is consistent with expected loss of IHC sensitivity associated with tissue fixation/embedding. The HercepTest did not improve sensitivity and introduced false positives. Comparison of R60-based IHC with FISH demonstrates that patient survival is associated progressively to gene amplification level as determined by FISH, whereas for IHC an association is found only in the highest (3+) immunostaining group. Among FISH-negative tumors, 45 (6.6%) of 678 were IHC-positive, with a survival probability similar to that of FISH-negative/IHC-negative cases; FISH-positive/IHC-negative patients have a survival probability similar to that of FISH-positive/IHC-positive cases. CONCLUSION: IHC does not consistently discriminate patients likely to have a poor prognosis, whereas FISH provides superior prognostic information in segregating high-risk from lower-risk beast cancers. HER-2/neu protein overexpression in the absence of gene amplification occurs infrequently in breast cancer, in which case, patient outcome is similar to that of patients without the alteration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
ERBB2 amplification in breast cancer analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization
Kallioniemi, O. P., Kallioniemi, A., Kurisu, W., Thor, A., Chen, L. C., Smith, H. S., Waldman, F. M., Pinkel, D., & Gray, J. W. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.12.5321 · Cited by 555
Cited by
Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive breast cancer
Modi, S., Saura, C., Yamashita, T., Park, Y. H., Kim, S.-B., Tamura, K., Andre, F., Iwata, H., Ito, Y., Tsurutani, J., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1914510 · Cited by 2,006
Perez, E. A., Suman, V. J., Davidson, N. E., Martino, S., Kaufman, P. A., Lingle, W. L., Flynn, P. J., Ingle, J. N., Visscher, D., & Jenkins, R. B. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.03.4744 · Cited by 438
HER-2/neu Amplification Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Gastric Cancer
Park, D. I., Yun, J. W., Park, J. H., Oh, S. J., Kim, H. J., Cho, Y. K., Sohn, C. I., Jeon, W. K., Kim, B. I., Yoo, C. H., et al. (2006) · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s10620-005-9057-1 · Cited by 329
Hurley, J., Doliny, P., Reis, I., Silva, O., Gomez-Fernandez, C., Velez, P., Pauletti, G., Powell, J. E., Pegram, M. D., & Slamon, D. J. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.02.8886 · Cited by 245
Self-citationAffibody molecules as engineered protein drugs
Frejd, F. Y., & Kim, K.-T. (2017) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/emm.2017.35 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Pauletti, G., Dandekar, S., Rong, H., Ramos, L., Peng, H., Seshadri, R., & Slamon, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2000-11-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3651-3664
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2125730396
- Cited by
- 670
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Methods for Tissue-Based Detection of the HER-2/neu Alteration in Human Breast Cancer: A Direct Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.21.3651
- The paper
- Pauletti, G., Dandekar, S., Rong, H., Ramos, L., Peng, H., Seshadri, R., & Slamon, D. J. (2000). Assessment of Methods for Tissue-Based Detection of the HER-2/neu Alteration in Human Breast Cancer: A Direct Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.21.3651
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.