Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Surveillance for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Using Positron Emission Tomography

Lowe, Val J., Boyd, James H., Dunphy, Frank R., Kim, Han, Dunleavy, T., Collins, Brian T., Martin, David, Stack, Brendan C., Hollenbeak, Chris, Fletcher, J.W.·2000·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Earlier detection of head and neck cancer recurrence may improve survival. We evaluated the ability of [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to detect recurrence in a prospective trial using sequential PET scans. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Serial posttherapy FDG-PET was prospectively performed in 44 patients with stage III or IV head and neck cancer. PET was performed twice during the first posttreatment year (at 2 and 10 months after therapy) and thereafter as needed. After therapy, patients were grouped, based on tissue biopsies, into those who achieved a complete response (CR) and those who had residual disease (RD). Patients who achieved a CR were further grouped into those without evidence of disease and those who had recurrence by 1 year after completion of therapy. Disease status as determined by physical examination (PE), PET, and correlative imaging was compared. RESULTS: Eight patients were lost to follow-up and six had RD after therapy. Of the remaining 30 patients with a CR, 16 had recurrence in the first year after therapy. Five of these 16 patients had recurrence detected by PET only, four by PET and correlative imaging only, five by PE and PET only, and two by PE, correlative imaging, and PET. Only PET detected all recurrences in the first year. PET performed better than correlative imaging (P = .013) or PE (P = .002) in the detection of recurrence. CONCLUSION: PET can detect head and neck tumor recurrence when it may be undetectable by other clinical methods. FDG-PET permits highly accurate detection of head and neck cancer recurrence in the posttherapy period.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2000.18.3.651

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Lowe, V. J., Boyd, J. H., Dunphy, F. R., Kim, H., Dunleavy, T., Collins, B. T., Martin, D., Stack, B. C., Hollenbeak, C., & Fletcher, J. W.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2000-02-01
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
651-651
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1905966646
Cited by
239
References
0
FWCI
11.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surveillance for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Using Positron Emission Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.3.651
The paper
Lowe, V. J., Boyd, J. H., Dunphy, F. R., Kim, H., Dunleavy, T., Collins, B. T., Martin, D., Stack, B. C., Hollenbeak, C., & Fletcher, J. W. (2000). Surveillance for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer Using Positron Emission Tomography. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.3.651

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.