The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Outcome at 8 Years After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy for Invasive Breast Cancer: Influence of Margin Status and Systemic Therapy on Local Recurrence
Abstract
PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between pathologic margin status and outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population comprised 533 patients with International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage I or II breast cancer who had assessable margins, who received at least 60 Gy to the primary tumor bed, and who had more than 8 years of potential follow-up. Each margin was scored (according to the presence of invasive or in situ disease that touched the inked surgical margin) as one of the following: negative, close, focally positive, or extensively positive. Outcome at 8 years was calculated using crude rates of first site of failure. A polychotomous logistic regression analysis was performed. Median follow-up time was 127 months. RESULTS: At 8 years, patients with close margins and those with negative margins both had a rate of local recurrence (LR) of 7%. Patients with extensively positive margins had an LR rate of 27%, whereas patients with focally positive margins had an intermediate rate of LR of 14%. In the polychotomous logistic regression model, margin status and the use of systemic therapy were the only two variables that had significant effects on the risk ratio of LR to remaining alive and free of disease. Among the 45 patients with focally positive margins who received systemic therapy, the crude LR rate was 7% at 8 years (95% confidence interval, 1% to 20%). CONCLUSION: Pathologic margin status and the use of adjuvant systemic therapy are the most important factors associated with LR among patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Poggi, M. M., Danforth, D. N., Sciuto, L. C., Smith, S. L., Steinberg, S. M., Liewehr, D. J., Menard, C., Lippman, M. E., Lichter, A. S., & Altemus, R. M. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11580 · Cited by 569
Houssami, N., Macaskill, P., Luke Marinovich, M., & Morrow, M. (2014) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-014-3480-5 · Cited by 532
Beyond the margins: real-time detection of cancer using targeted fluorophores
Zhang, R. R., Schroeder, A. B., Grudzinski, J. J., Rosenthal, E. L., Warram, J. M., Pinchuk, A. N., Eliceiri, K. W., Kuo, J. S., & Weichert, J. P. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.212 · Cited by 485
Wapnir, I. L., Anderson, S. J., Mamounas, E. P., Geyer, C. E., Jeong, J.-H., Tan-Chiu, E., Fisher, B., & Wolmark, N. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.04.3273 · Cited by 466
Lamberts, L. E., Koch, M., de Jong, J. S., Adams, A. L. L., Glatz, J., Kranendonk, M. E. G., Terwisscha van Scheltinga, A. G. T., Jansen, L., de Vries, J., Lub-de Hooge, M. N., et al. (2017) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0437 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, C. C., Mitsumori, M., Nixon, A., Recht, A., Connolly, J., Gelman, R., Silver, B., Hetelekidis, S., Abner, A., Harris, J. R., & Schnitt, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2000-04-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1668-1675
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2172480593
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outcome at 8 Years After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy for Invasive Breast Cancer: Influence of Margin Status and Systemic Therapy on Local Recurrence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.8.1668
- The paper
- Park, C. C., Mitsumori, M., Nixon, A., Recht, A., Connolly, J., Gelman, R., Silver, B., Hetelekidis, S., Abner, A., Harris, J. R., & Schnitt, S. J. (2000). Outcome at 8 Years After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy for Invasive Breast Cancer: Influence of Margin Status and Systemic Therapy on Local Recurrence. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.8.1668
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.