Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Positron Emission Tomography Using [18F]-Fluorodeoxy-d-Glucose to Predict the Pathologic Response of Breast Cancer to Primary Chemotherapy

Smith, Ian C., Welch, Andrew E., Hutcheon, Andrew W., Miller, Iain D., Payne, Simon, Chilcott, Felice, Waikar, Smruti, Whitaker, Teena, Ah-See, Antoinne K., Eremin, Oleg, Heys, Steven D., Gilbert, Fiona J., Sharp, Peter F.·2000·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether [18 F]-fluorodeoxy-d-glucose ([18 F]-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) can predict the pathologic response of primary and metastatic breast cancer to chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with noninflammatory, large (> 3 cm), or locally advanced breast cancers received eight doses of primary chemotherapy. Dynamic PET imaging was performed immediately before the first, second, and fifth doses and after the last dose of treatment. Primary tumors and involved axillary lymph nodes were identified, and the [18 F]-FDG uptake values were calculated (expressed as semiquantitative dose uptake ratio [DUR] and influx constant [K]). Pathologic response was determined after chemotherapy by evaluation of surgical resection specimens. RESULTS: Thirty-one primary breast lesions were identified. The mean pretreatment DUR values of the eight lesions that achieved a complete microscopic pathologic response were significantly (P = .037) higher than those from less responsive lesions. The mean reduction in DUR after the first pulse of chemotherapy was significantly greater in lesions that achieved a partial (P = .013), complete macroscopic (P = .003), or complete microscopic (P = .001) pathologic response. PET after a single pulse of chemotherapy was able to predict complete pathologic response with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 74%. Eleven patients had pathologic evidence of lymph node metastases. Mean pretreatment DUR values in the metastatic lesions that responded did not differ significantly from those that failed to respond (P = .076). However, mean pretreatment K values were significantly higher in ultimately responsive cancers (P = .037). The mean change in DUR and K after the first pulse of chemotherapy was significantly greater in responding lesions (DUR, P = .038; K, P = .012). CONCLUSION: [18 F]-FDG PET imaging of primary and metastatic breast cancer after a single pulse of chemotherapy may be of value in the prediction of pathologic treatment response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2000.18.8.1676

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Smith, I. C., Welch, A. E., Hutcheon, A. W., Miller, I. D., Payne, S., Chilcott, F., Waikar, S., Whitaker, T., Ah-See, A. K., Eremin, O., Heys, S. D., Gilbert, F. J., & Sharp, P. F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2000-04-08
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
1676-1688
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2177221443
Cited by
406
References
0
FWCI
21.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Positron Emission Tomography Using [18F]-Fluorodeoxy-d-Glucose to Predict the Pathologic Response of Breast Cancer to Primary Chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2000.18.8.1676
The paper
Smith, I. C., Welch, A. E., Hutcheon, A. W., Miller, I. D., Payne, S., Chilcott, F., Waikar, S., Whitaker, T., Ah-See, A. K., Eremin, O., Heys, S. D., Gilbert, F. J., & Sharp, P. F. (2000). Positron Emission Tomography Using [18F]-Fluorodeoxy-d-Glucose to Predict the Pathologic Response of Breast Cancer to Primary Chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.8.1676

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.