The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Metabolic Flare: Indicator of Hormone Responsiveness in Advanced Breast Cancer
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether positron emission tomography (PET) with the glucose analog [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and the estrogen analog 16 alpha-[18 F]fluoroestradiol-17 beta (FES), performed before and after treatment with tamoxifen, could be used to detect hormone-induced changes in tumor metabolism (metabolic flare) and changes in available levels of estrogen receptor (ER). In addition, we investigated whether these PET findings would predict hormonally responsive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty women with biopsy-proved advanced ER-positive (ER+) breast cancer underwent PET with FDG and FES before and 7 to 10 days after initiation of tamoxifen therapy; 70 lesions were evaluated. Tumor FDG and FES uptake were assessed semiquantitatively by the standardized uptake value (SUV) method. The PET results were correlated with response to hormonal therapy. RESULTS: In the responders, the tumor FDG uptake increased after tamoxifen by 28.4% ± 23.3% (mean ± SD); only five of these patients had evidence of a clinical flare reaction. In nonresponders, there was no significant change in tumor FDG uptake from baseline (mean change, 10.1% ± 16.2%; P = .0002 v responders). Lesions of responders had higher baseline FES uptake (SUV, 4.3 ± 2.4) than those of nonresponders (SUV, 1.8 ± 1.3; P = .0007). All patients had evidence of blockade of the tumor ERs 7 to 10 days after initiation of tamoxifen therapy; however, the degree of ER blockade was greater in the responders (mean percentage decrease, 54.8% ± 14.2%) than in the nonresponders (mean percentage decrease, 19.4% ± 17.3%; P = .0003). CONCLUSION: The functional status of tumor ERs can be characterized in vivo by PET with FDG and FES. The results of PET are predictive of responsiveness to tamoxifen therapy in patients with advanced ER+ breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
FDG PET, PET/CT, and Breast Cancer Imaging
Rosen, E. L., Eubank, W. B., & Mankoff, D. A. (2007) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.27si075517 · Cited by 265
PET/CT imaging in cancer: current applications and future directions
Farwell, M. D., Pryma, D. A., & Mankoff, D. A. (2014) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28860 · Cited by 230
Lok, S. W., Whittle, J. R., Vaillant, F., Teh, C. E., Lo, L. L., Policheni, A. N., Bergin, A. R. T., Desai, J., Ftouni, S., Gandolfo, L. C., et al. (2019) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-1151 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Mortimer, J. E., Dehdashti, F., Siegel, B. A., Trinkaus, K., Katzenellenbogen, J. A., & Welch, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2001-06-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2797-2803
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1809083310
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic Flare: Indicator of Hormone Responsiveness in Advanced Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2797
- The paper
- Mortimer, J. E., Dehdashti, F., Siegel, B. A., Trinkaus, K., Katzenellenbogen, J. A., & Welch, M. J. (2001). Metabolic Flare: Indicator of Hormone Responsiveness in Advanced Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2797
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.