Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 410

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Metabolic Flare: Indicator of Hormone Responsiveness in Advanced Breast Cancer

Mortimer, Joanne E., Dehdashti, Farrokh, Siegel, Barry A., Trinkaus, Kathryn, Katzenellenbogen, John A., Welch, Michael J.·2001·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether positron emission tomography (PET) with the glucose analog [18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and the estrogen analog 16 alpha-[18 F]fluoroestradiol-17 beta (FES), performed before and after treatment with tamoxifen, could be used to detect hormone-induced changes in tumor metabolism (metabolic flare) and changes in available levels of estrogen receptor (ER). In addition, we investigated whether these PET findings would predict hormonally responsive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty women with biopsy-proved advanced ER-positive (ER+) breast cancer underwent PET with FDG and FES before and 7 to 10 days after initiation of tamoxifen therapy; 70 lesions were evaluated. Tumor FDG and FES uptake were assessed semiquantitatively by the standardized uptake value (SUV) method. The PET results were correlated with response to hormonal therapy. RESULTS: In the responders, the tumor FDG uptake increased after tamoxifen by 28.4% ± 23.3% (mean ± SD); only five of these patients had evidence of a clinical flare reaction. In nonresponders, there was no significant change in tumor FDG uptake from baseline (mean change, 10.1% ± 16.2%; P = .0002 v responders). Lesions of responders had higher baseline FES uptake (SUV, 4.3 ± 2.4) than those of nonresponders (SUV, 1.8 ± 1.3; P = .0007). All patients had evidence of blockade of the tumor ERs 7 to 10 days after initiation of tamoxifen therapy; however, the degree of ER blockade was greater in the responders (mean percentage decrease, 54.8% ± 14.2%) than in the nonresponders (mean percentage decrease, 19.4% ± 17.3%; P = .0003). CONCLUSION: The functional status of tumor ERs can be characterized in vivo by PET with FDG and FES. The results of PET are predictive of responsiveness to tamoxifen therapy in patients with advanced ER+ breast cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2797

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 410

Metadata

Authors
Mortimer, J. E., Dehdashti, F., Siegel, B. A., Trinkaus, K., Katzenellenbogen, J. A., & Welch, M. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2001-06-01
Volume
19
Issue
11
Pages
2797-2803
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1809083310
Cited by
410
References
0
FWCI
8.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic Flare: Indicator of Hormone Responsiveness in Advanced Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2797
The paper
Mortimer, J. E., Dehdashti, F., Siegel, B. A., Trinkaus, K., Katzenellenbogen, J. A., & Welch, M. J. (2001). Metabolic Flare: Indicator of Hormone Responsiveness in Advanced Breast Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.11.2797

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.