The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Zoledronic Acid Is Superior to Pamidronate in the Treatment of Hypercalcemia of Malignancy: A Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials
Abstract
PURPOSE: Two identical, concurrent, parallel, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trials were conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid and pamidronate for treating hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe HCM (corrected serum calcium [CSC] ≥ 3.00 mmol/L [12.0 mg/dL]) were treated with a single dose of zoledronic acid (4 or 8 mg) via 5-minute infusion or pamidronate (90 mg) via 2-hour infusion. A protocol-specified pooled analysis of the two parallel trials was performed. Clinical end points included rate of complete response by day 10, response duration, and time to relapse. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-seven patients were randomized and evaluated for safety; 275 were evaluated for efficacy. Both doses of zoledronic acid were superior to pamidronate in the treatment of HCM. The complete response rates by day 10 were 88.4% (P = .002), 86.7% (P = .015), and 69.7% for zoledronic acid 4 mg and 8 mg and pamidronate 90 mg, respectively. Normalization of CSC occurred by day 4 in approximately 50% of patients treated with zoledronic acid and in only 33.3% of the pamidronate-treated patients. The median duration of complete response favored zoledronic acid 4 and 8 mg over pamidronate 90 mg with response durations of 32, 43, and 18 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: Zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate; 4 mg is the dose recommended for initial treatment of HCM and 8 mg for relapsed or refractory hypercalcemia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rosen, L. S., Gordon, D., Kaminski, M., Howell, A., Belch, A., Mackey, J., Apffelstaedt, J., Hussein, M. A., Coleman, R. E., Reitsma, D. J., et al. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11701 · Cited by 873
Self-citation(2007) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2006.11.003 · Cited by 837
Multiple Myeloma: Diagnosis and Treatment
Rajkumar, S. V., & Kumar, S. (2016) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.11.007 · Cited by 812
Rosen, L. S., Gordon, D., Tchekmedyian, N. S., Yanagihara, R., Hirsh, V., Krzakowski, M., Pawlicki, M., de Souza, P., Zheng, M., Urbanowitz, G., et al. (2004) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.20308 · Cited by 705
Self-citationRuggiero, S. L., Gralow, J. R., Marx, R. E., Hoff, A. O., Schubert, M. M., Huryn, J. M., Toth, B., Damato, K., & Valero, V. (2006) · Journal of Oncology Practice · doi:10.1200/jop.2.1.7 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Major, P., Lortholary, A., Hon, J., Abdi, E., Mills, G., Menssen, H. D., Yunus, F., Bell, R., Body, J., Quebe-Fehling, E., & Seaman, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2001-01-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 558-567
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W1951349736
- Cited by
- 858
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zoledronic Acid Is Superior to Pamidronate in the Treatment of Hypercalcemia of Malignancy: A Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.2.558
- The paper
- Major, P., Lortholary, A., Hon, J., Abdi, E., Mills, G., Menssen, H. D., Yunus, F., Bell, R., Body, J., Quebe-Fehling, E., & Seaman, J. (2001). Zoledronic Acid Is Superior to Pamidronate in the Treatment of Hypercalcemia of Malignancy: A Pooled Analysis of Two Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.2.558
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.