Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 610

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ERCC1 and Thymidylate Synthase mRNA Levels Predict Survival for Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Combination Oxaliplatin and Fluorouracil Chemotherapy

Shirota, Yoshinori, Stoehlmacher, Jan, Brabender, Jan, Xiong, Yi-Ping, Uetake, Hiroyuki, Danenberg, Kathleen D., Groshen, Susan, Tsao-Wei, Denise D., Danenberg, Peter V., Lenz, Heinz-Josef·2001·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypotheses of whether the relative mRNA expression of the thymidylate synthase (TS) gene and the excision cross-complementing (ERCC1) gene are associated with response to and survival of fluorouracil (5-FU)/oxaliplatin chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had progressive stage IV disease after unsuccessful 5-FU and irinotecan chemotherapy. All patients were evaluated for eligibility for a compassionate 5-FU/oxaliplatin protocol. cDNA was derived from paraffin-embedded tumor specimens to determine TS and ERCC1 mRNA expression relative to the internal reference gene beta-actin using fluorescence-based, real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The median TS gene expression level from 50 metastasized tumors was 3.4 × 10−3 (minimum expression, 0.18 × 10−3;maximum expression, 11.5 × 10−3), and the median ERCC1 gene expression level was 2.53 × 10−3 (minimum, 0.0; maximum, 14.61 × 10−3). The gene expression cutoff values for chemotherapy nonresponse were 7.5 × 10−3 for TS and 4.9 × 10−3 for ERCC1. The median survival time for patients with TS ≤ 7.5 × 10−3 (43 of 50 patients) was 10.2 months, compared with 1.5 months for patients with TS greater than 7.5 × 10−3 (P < .001). Patients with ERCC1 expression ≤ 4.9 × 10−3 (40 of 50 patients) had a median survival time of 10.2 months, compared with 1.9 months for patients with ERCC1 expression greater than 4.9 × 10−3 (P < .001). A TS of 7.5 × 10−3 segregated significantly into response, stable disease, and progression (P = .02), whereas the association between ERCC1 and response did not reach statistical significance (P = .29). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that intratumoral ERCC1 mRNA and TS mRNA expression levels are independent predictive markers of survival for 5-FU and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in 5-FU–resistant metastatic colorectal cancer. Precise definition of the best TS cut point will require further analysis in a large, prospective study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2001.19.23.4298

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Shirota, Y., Stoehlmacher, J., Brabender, J., Xiong, Y.-P., Uetake, H., Danenberg, K. D., Groshen, S., Tsao-Wei, D. D., Danenberg, P. V., & Lenz, H.-J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2001-12-01
Volume
19
Issue
23
Pages
4298-4304
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2156214772
Cited by
610
References
1
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.