Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 816

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology*

Recht, Abram, Edge, Stephen B., Solin, Lawrence J., Robinson, David S., Estabrook, Alison, Fine, Richard E., Fleming, Gini F., Formenti, Silvia, Hudis, Clifford, Kirshner, Jeffrey J., Krause, David A., Kuske, Robert R., Langer, Amy S., Sledge, George W., Whelan, Timothy J., Pfister, David G.·2001·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine indications for the use of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for patients with invasive breast cancer with involved axil-lary lymph nodes or locally advanced disease who receive systemic therapy. These guidelines are intended for use in the care of patients outside of clinical trials. POTENTIAL INTERVENTION: The benefits and risks of PMRT in such patients, as well as subgroups of these patients, were considered. The details of the PMRT technique were also evaluated. OUTCOMES: The outcomes considered included freedom from local-regional recurrence, survival (disease-free and overall), and long-term toxicity. EVIDENCE: An expert multidisciplinary panel reviewed pertinent information from the published literature through July 2000; certain investigators were contacted for more recent and, in some cases, unpublished information. A computerized search was performed of MEDLINE data; directed searches based on the bibliographies of primary articles were also performed. VALUES: Levels of evidence and guideline grades were assigned by the Panel using standard criteria. A “recommendation” was made when level I or II evidence was available and there was consensus as to its meaning. A “suggestion” was made based on level III, IV, or V evidence and there was consensus as to its meaning. Areas of clinical importance were pointed out where guidelines could not be formulated due to insufficient evidence or lack of consensus. RECOMMENDATIONS: The recommendations, suggestions, and expert opinions of the Panel are described in this article. VALIDATION: Seven outside reviewers, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Research Committee members, and the ASCO Board of Directors reviewed this document.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2001.19.5.1539

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 816

Metadata

Authors
Recht, A., Edge, S. B., Solin, L. J., Robinson, D. S., Estabrook, A., Fine, R. E., Fleming, G. F., Formenti, S., Hudis, C., Kirshner, J. J., Krause, D. A., Kuske, R. R., Langer, A. S., Sledge, G. W., Whelan, T. J., & Pfister, D. G.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2001-03-01
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
1539-1569
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2122761438
Cited by
816
References
1
FWCI
10.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.5.1539
The paper
Recht, A., Edge, S. B., Solin, L. J., Robinson, D. S., Estabrook, A., Fine, R. E., Fleming, G. F., Formenti, S., Hudis, C., Kirshner, J. J., Krause, D. A., Kuske, R. R., Langer, A. S., Sledge, G. W., Whelan, T. J., & Pfister, D. G. (2001). Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology*. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.5.1539

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.