Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 729

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved Prognostication of Renal Cell Carcinoma Using an Integrated Staging System

Zisman, Amnon, Pantuck, Allan J., Dorey, Fredrick, Said, Jonathan W., Shvarts, Oleg, Quintana, Deanna, Gitlitz, Barbara J., deKernion, Jean B., Figlin, Robert A., Belldegrun, Arie S.·2001·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To integrate stage, grade, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) into a clinically useful tool capable of stratifying the survival of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 661 patients undergoing nephrectomy at University of California Los Angeles between 1989 and 1999 were evaluated. Median age was 61 years, male-to-female ratio was 2.2:1, and median follow-up was 37 months. Survival time was the primary end point assessed. Sixty-four possible combinations of stage, grade, and ECOG PS were analyzed and collapsed into distinct groups. The internal validity of the categoriesd was challenged by a univariate analysis and a multivariate analysis testing for the accountability of each UCLA Integrated Staging System (UISS) category against independent variables shown to have impact on survival. RESULTS: Combining and stratifying 1997 tumor-node-metastasis stage, Fuhrman’s grade and ECOG PS resulted in five survival stratification groups designated UISS, and numbered I to V. The projected 2- and 5-year survival for the UISS groups are as follows for the groups: I, 96% and 94%; II, 89% and 67%; III, 66% and 39%; IV, 42% and 23%; and V, 9% and 0%, respectively. UISS accounted for the significant variables in the variate analysis. CONCLUSION: A novel system for staging and predicting survival for RCC integrating clinical variables is offered. UISS is simple to use and is superior to stage alone in differentiating patients’ survival. Our data suggests that UISS is an important prognostic tool for counseling patients with various stages of kidney cancer. Further prospective large-scale validation with external data is awaited.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1649

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 729

Metadata

Authors
Zisman, A., Pantuck, A. J., Dorey, F., Said, J. W., Shvarts, O., Quintana, D., Gitlitz, B. J., deKernion, J. B., Figlin, R. A., & Belldegrun, A. S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2001-03-15
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1649-1657
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W1896930635
Cited by
729
References
1
FWCI
20.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved Prognostication of Renal Cell Carcinoma Using an Integrated Staging System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1649
The paper
Zisman, A., Pantuck, A. J., Dorey, F., Said, J. W., Shvarts, O., Quintana, D., Gitlitz, B. J., deKernion, J. B., Figlin, R. A., & Belldegrun, A. S. (2001). Improved Prognostication of Renal Cell Carcinoma Using an Integrated Staging System. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1649

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.