Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 445

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Localized Ewing Tumor of Bone: Final Results of the Cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study CESS 86

Paulussen, M., Ahrens, S., Dunst, J., Winkelmann, W., Exner, G.U., Kotz, R., Amann, G., Dockhorn-Dworniczak, B., Harms, D., Müller-Weihrich, S., Welte, K., Kornhuber, B., Janka-Schaub, G., Göbel, U., Treuner, J., Voûte, P.A., Zoubek, A., Gadner, H., Jürgens, H.·2001·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study (CESS) 86 aimed at improving event-free survival (EFS) in patients with high-risk localized Ewing tumor of bone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 301 patients recruited from January 1986 to July 1991 (60% male; median age 15 years). Tumors of volume >100 mL and/or at central-axis sites qualified patients for “high risk” (HR, n = 241), and small extremity lesions for “standard risk” (SR, n = 52). Standard-risk patients received 12 courses of vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin alternating with actinomycin D (VACA); HR patients received ifosfamide instead of cyclophosphamide (VAIA). Tumor sites were pelvis (27%), other central axis (28%), femur (19%), or other extremity (26%). The initial tumor volume was <100 mL in 33% of cases and ≥100 mL in 67%. Local therapy was surgery (23%), surgery plus radiotherapy (49%), or radiotherapy alone (28%). Event-free survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analyses, comparisons were done by log-rank test, and risk factors were analyzed by Cox models. RESULTS: On May 1, 1999 (median time under study, 133 months), the 10-year EFS was 0.52. Event-free survival did not differ between SR-VACA (0.52) and HR-VAIA (0.51, P = .92). Tumor volume of >200 mL (EFS, 0.36 v 0.63 for smaller tumors; P = .0001) and poor histologic response (EFS, 0.38 v 0.64 for good responders; P = .0007) had negative impacts on EFS. In multivariate analyses, small tumor volumes of <200 mL, good histologic response, and VAIA chemotherapy augured for fair outcome. Six of 301 patients (2%) died under treatment, and four patients (1.3%) developed second malignancies. CONCLUSION: Fifty-two percent of CESS 86 patients survived after risk-adapted therapy. High-risk patients seem to have benefited from intensified treatment that incorporated ifosfamide.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1818

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 445

Metadata

Authors
Paulussen, M., Ahrens, S., Dunst, J., Winkelmann, W., Exner, G. U., Kotz, R., Amann, G., Dockhorn-Dworniczak, B., Harms, D., Müller-Weihrich, S., Welte, K., Kornhuber, B., Janka-Schaub, G., Göbel, U., Treuner, J., Voûte, P. A., Zoubek, A., Gadner, H., & Jürgens, H.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2001-03-15
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
1818-1829
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2154211764
Cited by
445
References
1
FWCI
13.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Localized Ewing Tumor of Bone: Final Results of the Cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study CESS 86. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1818
The paper
Paulussen, M., Ahrens, S., Dunst, J., Winkelmann, W., Exner, G. U., Kotz, R., Amann, G., Dockhorn-Dworniczak, B., Harms, D., Müller-Weihrich, S., Welte, K., Kornhuber, B., Janka-Schaub, G., Göbel, U., Treuner, J., Voûte, P. A., Zoubek, A., Gadner, H., & Jürgens, H. (2001). Localized Ewing Tumor of Bone: Final Results of the Cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study CESS 86. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.6.1818

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.