Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer: Analysis of Stage, Sex, and Local Control—Final Report of Intergroup 0114

Tepper, J.E., O’Connell, M., Niedzwiecki, D., Hollis, D.R., Benson, A.B., Cummings, B., Gunderson, L.L., Macdonald, J.S., Martenson, J.A., Mayer, R.J.·2002·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: The gastrointestinal Intergroup studied postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in patients with T3/4 and N+ rectal cancer after potentially curative surgery to try to improve chemotherapy and to determine the risk of systemic and local failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had a potentially curative surgical resection and were treated with two cycles of chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation therapy and two additional cycles of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy regimens were bolus fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-FU and leucovorin, 5-FU and levamisole, and 5-FU, leucovorin, and levamisole. Pelvic irradiation was given to a dose of 45 Gy to the whole pelvis and a boost to 50.4 to 54 Gy. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred ninety-five patients were entered and fully assessable, with a median follow-up of 7.4 years. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) by drug regimen. DFS and OS decreased between years 5 and 7 (from 54% to 50% and 64% to 56%, respectively), although recurrence-free rates had only a small decrease. The local recurrence rate was 14% (9% in low-risk [T1 to N2+] and 18% in high-risk patients [T3N+, T4N]). Overall, 7-year survival rates were 70% and 45% for the low-risk and high-risk groups, respectively. Males had a poorer overall survival rate than females. CONCLUSION: There is no advantage to leucovorin- or levamisole-containing regimens over bolus 5-FU alone in the adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer when combined with irradiation. Local and distant recurrence rates are still high, especially in T3N+ and T4 patients, even with full adjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2002.07.132

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Tepper, J. E., O’Connell, M., Niedzwiecki, D., Hollis, D. R., Benson, A. B., Cummings, B., Gunderson, L. L., Macdonald, J. S., Martenson, J. A., & Mayer, R. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2002-04-01
Volume
20
Issue
7
Pages
1744-1750
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2108165913
Cited by
321
References
6
FWCI
11.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer: Analysis of Stage, Sex, and Local Control—Final Report of Intergroup 0114. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2002.07.132
The paper
Tepper, J. E., O’Connell, M., Niedzwiecki, D., Hollis, D. R., Benson, A. B., Cummings, B., Gunderson, L. L., Macdonald, J. S., Martenson, J. A., & Mayer, R. J. (2002). Adjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer: Analysis of Stage, Sex, and Local Control—Final Report of Intergroup 0114. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.07.132

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.