Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 289

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Open access
Kamada, Tadashi, Tsujii, Hirohiko, Tsuji, Hiroshi, Yanagi, Tsuyoshi, Mizoe, Jun-etsu, Miyamoto, Tadaaki, Kato, Hirotoshi, Yamada, Shigeru, Morita, Shinroku, Yoshikawa, Kyousan, Kandatsu, Susumu, Tateishi, Akio·2002·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the tolerance for and effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy in patients with unresectable bone and soft tissue sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase I/II dose escalation study of carbon ion radiotherapy. Fifty-seven patients with 64 sites of bone and soft tissue sarcomas not suited for resection received carbon ion radiotherapy. Tumors involved the spine or paraspinous soft tissues in 19 patients, pelvis in 32 patients, and extremities in six patients. The total dose ranged from 52.8 to 73.6 gray equivalent (GyE) and was administered in 16 fixed fractions over 4 weeks (3.3 to 4.6 GyE/fraction). The median tumor size was 559 cm 3 (range, 20 to 2,290 cm 3). The minimum follow-up was 18 months. RESULTS: Seven of 17 patients treated with the highest total dose of 73.6 GyE experienced Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3 acute skin reactions. Dose escalation was then halted at this level. No other severe acute reactions (grade > 3) were observed in this series. The overall local control rates were 88% and 73% at 1 year and 3 years of follow-up, respectively. The median survival time was 31 months (range, 2 to 60 months), and the 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 82% and 46%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Carbon ion radiotherapy seems to be a safe and effective modality in the management of bone and soft tissue sarcomas not eligible for surgical resection, providing good local control and offering a survival advantage without unacceptable morbidity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2002.10.050

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 289

Metadata

Authors
Kamada, T., Tsujii, H., Tsuji, H., Yanagi, T., Mizoe, J.-E., Miyamoto, T., Kato, H., Yamada, S., Morita, S., Yoshikawa, K., Kandatsu, S., & Tateishi, A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2002-11-15
Volume
20
Issue
22
Pages
4466-4471
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2143256090
Cited by
289
References
0
FWCI
9.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2002.10.050
The paper
Kamada, T., Tsujii, H., Tsuji, H., Yanagi, T., Mizoe, J.-E., Miyamoto, T., Kato, H., Yamada, S., Morita, S., Yoshikawa, K., Kandatsu, S., & Tateishi, A. (2002). Efficacy and Safety of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.10.050

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.