The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Complication Rates Among Cancer Patients With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
Abstract
PURPOSE: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are frequently used to deliver outpatient courses of intravenous therapy. However, the rates and risks of complication for this device have not been well-studied. Our objective was to determine the incidence and risk factors of PICC-related complications with a 1-year prospective observational study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All PICCs inserted in adult and pediatric patients at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) were followed prospectively. The device insertion team, inpatient nurses, and various home-care companies and outside institutions collected longitudinal data. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-one PICCs were inserted during the study period and followed for a total of 10,562 catheter-days (median placement, 15 days; range, 1 to 487 days). Two hundred five PICCs (58%) were managed by home-care companies and outside institutions, and 146 PICCs (42%) were managed exclusively at MSKCC. For these 205 PICCs, 131 nurses from 74 home-care companies and institutions were contacted for follow-up clinical information. In all, 115 (32.8%) of 351 PICCs were removed as a result of a complication, for a rate of 10.9 per 1,000 catheter-days. Patients with hematologic malignancy or bone marrow transplant were more likely to develop a complication, whereas those with metastatic disease were less likely. CONCLUSION: Complications occur frequently among cancer patients with PICCs, and long-term follow-up is onerous. Despite a high complication rate, the ease of insertion and removal argues for continued PICC use in the cancer population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Venous Thromboembolism and Cancer: Risks and Outcomes
Lee, A. Y. Y., & Levine, M. N. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000078466.72504.ac · Cited by 721
Chopra, V., Flanders, S. A., Saint, S., Woller, S. C., O'Grady, N. P., Safdar, N., Trerotola, S. O., Saran, R., Moureau, N., Wiseman, S., et al. (2015) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m15-0744 · Cited by 599
Bodai, B. I., & Tuso, P. (2015) · The Permanente Journal · doi:10.7812/tpp/14-241 · Cited by 397
Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Catheter-Related Thrombosis in Adult Patients With Cancer
Lee, A. Y. Y., Levine, M. N., Butler, G., Webb, C., Costantini, L., Gu, C., & Julian, J. A. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.03.5600 · Cited by 286
Young, A., Chapman, O., Connor, C., Poole, C., Rose, P., & Kakkar, A. K. (2012) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.106 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Walshe, L. J., Malak, S. F., Eagan, J., & Sepkowitz, K. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3276-3281
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2008627505
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complication Rates Among Cancer Patients With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2002.11.135
- The paper
- Walshe, L. J., Malak, S. F., Eagan, J., & Sepkowitz, K. A. (2002). Complication Rates Among Cancer Patients With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.11.135
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.