Cited by 163Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer StudiesNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances

DPC4/Smad4 Expression and Outcome in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Biankin, Andrew V., Morey, Adrienne L., Lee, C.-Soon, Kench, James G., Biankin, Sandra A., Hook, Henry C., Head, Darren R., Hugh, Thomas B. +2 more·2002·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prognostic indicators in pancreatic cancer (PC) are poorly defined and difficult to quantify preoperatively, hence they may lead to inappropriate patient selection for treatment. We examined the protein expression of key cell-cycle regulatory and cell-signaling molecules that occur at high frequency in PC and assessed their relationship to clinicopathologic parameters, response to operative resection, and outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 348 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and assessed the influence of reported clinicopathologic prognostic factors and the expression of the cell-cycle regulatory genes p21 WAF1/CIP1 (CDKN1A), cyclin D1 (CCND1), p53, and p16 INK4A (CDKN2) and the cell-signaling molecule DPC4/Smad4 (MADH4) using immunohistochemistry in a subgroup of 129 patients. RESULTS: Independent prognostic factors in resected patients were tumor size greater than 45 mm (P = .0015), involvement of surgical margins (P < .0001), and perineural invasion (P = .014). Loss of DPC4/Smad4 expression cosegregated with resectability (P < .0001) and was associated with improved survival after resection (P < .0001), whereas resection did not improve survival in patients whose tumor expressed DPC4/Smad4 (P = .5). Aberrant expression of p21 WAF1/CIP1, cyclin D1, p53, or p16 INK4A was not associated with a difference in survival. CONCLUSION: Tumor size (> 45 mm), resection margin involvement, and perineural invasion were independent prognostic factors. Preoperative assessment of DPC4/Smad4 expression has potential as a prognostic indicator in patients with PC since resection did not benefit those patients whose cancers expressed DPC4/Smad4 and accurate assessment of DPC4/Smad4 expression, unlike tumor size, margin status, and perineural invasion, does not require resection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2002.12.063

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with DPC4-expressed cancers exhibit longer survival.

    “Patients with DPC4-expressed cancers exhibit longer survival, emphasizing the significance of SMAD4 in treatment outcomes.”
  • DPC4 gene frequently experiences inactivation in PDAC, leading to enhanced metastasis and worse prognosis.

    “The DPC4 gene, encoding SMAD4, frequently experiences inactivation in PDAC, leading to enhanced metastasis and worse prognosis.”
  • In a cohort of 348 PDAC patients, DPC4/Smad4 expression loss was found in 53% of tumors.

    “In a cohort of 348 PDAC patients, DPC4/Smad4 expression loss was found in 53% of tumors.”
  • SMAD4 loss is associated with distant metastases.

    “Notably, SMAD4 loss is associated with distant metastases, highlighting its role in disease progression patterns [72,73,74,75,76,118].”
  • In resected cases, loss of DPC4/Smad4 is associated with improved survival, suggesting it as a potential indicator for a beneficial response to resection.

    “In resected cases, loss of DPC4/Smad4 is associated with improved survival, suggesting it as a potential indicator for a beneficial response to resection [73].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Biankin, A. V., Morey, A. L., Lee, C.-S., Kench, J. G., Biankin, S. A., Hook, H. C., Head, D. R., Hugh, T. B., Sutherland, R. L., & Henshall, S. M.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2002-12-01
Volume
20
Issue
23
Pages
4531-4542
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2133654949
Cited by
163
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, prognostic factors, tumor resectability, surgical margins, perineural invasion, tumor size, p21, cyclin D1, p53, p16INK4a, cell cycle regulatory genes, signaling molecules, survival after resection
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, DNA-Binding Proteins, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Trans-Activators, Down-Regulation, Up-Regulation, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Survival Analysis, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Cyclins, Treatment Outcome, Cyclin D1, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21, Smad4 Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review