Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase I/II Trial of Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, and Radiation for Rectal Cancer

Rödel, Claus, Grabenbauer, Gerhard. G., Papadopoulos, Thomas, Hohenberger, Werner, Schmoll, Hans-Joachim, Sauer, Rolf·2003·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility and efficacy of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX-RT) in patients with rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Thirty-two patients with locally advanced (T3/T4) or low-lying rectal cancer received preoperative RT (total dose, 50.4 Gy). Capecitabine was administered concurrently at 825 mg/m 2 bid on days 1 to 14 and 22 to 35, with oxaliplatin starting at 50 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 with planned escalation steps of 10 mg/m 2. End points of the phase II study included downstaging, histopathologic tumor regression, resectability of T4 disease, and sphincter preservation in patients with low-lying tumors. Results: Dose-limiting grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in two of six patients treated with 60 mg/m 2 of oxaliplatin. Thus, 50 mg/m 2 was the recommended dose for the phase II study. Toxicities observed at this dose level were generally mild, with only two cases of short-lived grade 3 diarrhea. Myelosuppression, mainly leukopenia, was restricted to grade 2 in 19% of patients. T-category downstaging was achieved in 17 (55%) of 31 operated patients, and 68% of patients had negative lymph nodes. Pathologic complete response was found in 19% of the resected specimens. Radical surgery with free margins could be performed in 79% of patients with T4 disease, and 36% of patients with tumors ≤ 2 cm from the dentate line had sphincter-saving surgery. Conclusion: Preoperative XELOX-RT is a feasible and well tolerated treatment. This regimen is proposed for phase III evaluation comparing standard fluorouracil-based therapy with XELOX chemoradiotherapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2003.02.505

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Rödel, C., Grabenbauer, G. G., Papadopoulos, T., Hohenberger, W., Schmoll, H.-J., & Sauer, R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2003-08-15
Volume
21
Issue
16
Pages
3098-3104
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2130647939
Cited by
275
References
1
FWCI
12.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase I/II Trial of Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, and Radiation for Rectal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.02.505
The paper
Rödel, C., Grabenbauer, G. G., Papadopoulos, T., Hohenberger, W., Schmoll, H.-J., & Sauer, R. (2003). Phase I/II Trial of Capecitabine, Oxaliplatin, and Radiation for Rectal Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.02.505

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.