Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 546

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment of Primary CNS Lymphoma With Methotrexate and Deferred Radiotherapy: A Report of NABTT 96–07

Batchelor, Tracy, Carson, Kathryn, O’Neill, Alison, Grossman, Stuart A., Alavi, Jane, New, Pamela, Hochberg, Fred, Priet, Regina·2003·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Purpose: A multicenter, phase II study of single-agent, intravenous methotrexate in newly diagnosed non-AIDS-related primary CNS lymphoma was conducted in the New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) CNS Consortium. Methods: Methotrexate (8 g/m 2) was initially administered every 2 weeks. The primary end point was radiographic CR or PR, as defined by standard radiographic criteria, and secondary end points were survival and drug-related toxicity. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled with a mean age of 60 years and median Karnofsky Performance Score of 80. Three of 14 patients who underwent lumbar puncture had malignant cells on CSF cytopathology, and five of 25 patients had ocular involvement. Two patients could not be evaluated for the primary end point because of the absence of measurable disease in one and death before radiologic imaging in another. All patients have completed the treatment program or progressed. Among 23 patients, there were 12 CR (52%), five PR (22%), one (4%) with stable disease, and five progressions (22%) while on therapy. Seven patients died of tumor progression, and two died of other causes. Median progression-free survival was 12.8 months. Median overall survival for the entire group had not been reached at 22.8+ months. The toxicity of this regimen was modest, with no grade 3 or 4 toxicity in 13 of 25 patients, grade 3 toxicity in eight of 25 patients, and grade 4 toxicity in four of 25 patients after 287 cycles of chemotherapy. Conclusion: These results indicate that high-dose methotrexate is associated with modest toxicity and a radiographic response proportion (74%) comparable to more toxic regimens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2003.03.036

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 546

Metadata

Authors
Batchelor, T., Carson, K., O’Neill, A., Grossman, S. A., Alavi, J., New, P., Hochberg, F., & Priet, R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2003-03-15
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1044-1049
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2170487277
Cited by
546
References
3
FWCI
18.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Primary CNS Lymphoma With Methotrexate and Deferred Radiotherapy: A Report of NABTT 96–07. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.03.036
The paper
Batchelor, T., Carson, K., O’Neill, A., Grossman, S. A., Alavi, J., New, P., Hochberg, F., & Priet, R. (2003). Treatment of Primary CNS Lymphoma With Methotrexate and Deferred Radiotherapy: A Report of NABTT 96–07. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.03.036

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.