The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment of Primary CNS Lymphoma With Methotrexate and Deferred Radiotherapy: A Report of NABTT 96–07
Abstract
Purpose: A multicenter, phase II study of single-agent, intravenous methotrexate in newly diagnosed non-AIDS-related primary CNS lymphoma was conducted in the New Approaches to Brain Tumor Therapy (NABTT) CNS Consortium. Methods: Methotrexate (8 g/m 2) was initially administered every 2 weeks. The primary end point was radiographic CR or PR, as defined by standard radiographic criteria, and secondary end points were survival and drug-related toxicity. Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled with a mean age of 60 years and median Karnofsky Performance Score of 80. Three of 14 patients who underwent lumbar puncture had malignant cells on CSF cytopathology, and five of 25 patients had ocular involvement. Two patients could not be evaluated for the primary end point because of the absence of measurable disease in one and death before radiologic imaging in another. All patients have completed the treatment program or progressed. Among 23 patients, there were 12 CR (52%), five PR (22%), one (4%) with stable disease, and five progressions (22%) while on therapy. Seven patients died of tumor progression, and two died of other causes. Median progression-free survival was 12.8 months. Median overall survival for the entire group had not been reached at 22.8+ months. The toxicity of this regimen was modest, with no grade 3 or 4 toxicity in 13 of 25 patients, grade 3 toxicity in eight of 25 patients, and grade 4 toxicity in four of 25 patients after 287 cycles of chemotherapy. Conclusion: These results indicate that high-dose methotrexate is associated with modest toxicity and a radiographic response proportion (74%) comparable to more toxic regimens.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.
Macdonald, D. R., Cascino, T. L., Schold, S. C., & Cairncross, J. G. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1990.8.7.1277 · Cited by 2,409
Cited by
Abrey, L. E., Batchelor, T. T., Ferreri, A. J. M., Gospodarowicz, M., Pulczynski, E. J., Zucca, E., Smith, J. R., Korfel, A., Soussain, C., DeAngelis, L. M., et al. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.13.524 · Cited by 914
Self-citationHoang-Xuan, K., Bessell, E., Bromberg, J., Hottinger, A. F., Preusser, M., Rudà, R., Schlegel, U., Siegal, T., Soussain, C., Abacioglu, U., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00076-5 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Batchelor, T., Carson, K., O’Neill, A., Grossman, S. A., Alavi, J., New, P., Hochberg, F., & Priet, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2003-03-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1044-1049
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2170487277
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Primary CNS Lymphoma With Methotrexate and Deferred Radiotherapy: A Report of NABTT 96–07. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.03.036
- The paper
- Batchelor, T., Carson, K., O’Neill, A., Grossman, S. A., Alavi, J., New, P., Hochberg, F., & Priet, R. (2003). Treatment of Primary CNS Lymphoma With Methotrexate and Deferred Radiotherapy: A Report of NABTT 96–07. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.03.036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.