The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Phase I Clinical and Pharmacology Study of Clofarabine in Patients With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Abstract
Purpose: To define the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of clofarabine, given as a 1-hour infusion daily for 5 days, in patients with solid tumors and with acute leukemia. Patients and Methods: The initial part of the study defined the MTD and DLT in solid tumors. The second part of the study defined the MTD and DLT in acute leukemia. Results: The starting dose of clofarabine (15 mg/m 2) was myelosuppressive, requiring several dose de-escalations to 2 mg/m 2, the dose suggested for phase II studies in solid tumors. Dose escalation in acute leukemia started at 7.5 mg/m 2, with several escalations to 55 mg/m 2. The DLT was reversible hepatotoxicity at 55 mg/m 2. The recommended dose for acute leukemia phase II studies was 40 mg/m 2. Among 32 treated patients with acute leukemia, two achieved a complete response and three had a marrow complete response without platelet recovery (hematologic improvement), for an overall response rate of 16%. At 40 mg/m 2, the median plasma clofarabine level was 1.5 μmol/L (range, 0.42 to 3.2 μmol/L; n = 7). Cellular and plasma pharmacokinetic studies suggested dose proportionality but showed a wide variation in intracellular concentrations of clofarabine triphosphate. Conclusion: This phase I study defined the following two MTDs for clofarabine given as a 1-hour infusion daily for 5 days: 2 mg/m 2 for solid tumors, the DLT being myelosuppression; and 40 mg/m 2 for acute leukemia, the DLT being hepatotoxicity. Encouraging activity was observed in acute leukemia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Holbeck, S. L., Camalier, R., Crowell, J. A., Govindharajulu, J. P., Hollingshead, M., Anderson, L. W., Polley, E., Rubinstein, L., Srivastava, A., Wilsker, D., et al. (2017) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0489 · Cited by 359
Clofarabine, a novel nucleoside analog, is active in pediatric patients with advanced leukemia
Jeha, S., Gandhi, V., Chan, K. W., McDonald, L., Ramirez, I., Madden, R., Rytting, M., Brandt, M., Keating, M., Plunkett, W., et al. (2004) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2003-06-2122 · Cited by 256
Self-citationOptimal Dosing for Targeted Therapies in Oncology: Drug Development Cases Leading by Example
Sachs, J. R., Mayawala, K., Gadamsetty, S., Kang, S. P., & de Alwis, D. P. (2016) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-1295 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Kantarjian, H. M., Gandhi, V., Kozuch, P., Faderl, S., Giles, F., Cortes, J., O’Brien, S., Ibrahim, N., Khuri, F., Du, M., Rios, M. B., Jeha, S., McLaughlin, P., Plunkett, W., & Keating, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Published
- 2003-03-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1167-1173
- ISSN
- 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1527-7755
- OpenAlex
- W2116171965
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase I Clinical and Pharmacology Study of Clofarabine in Patients With Solid and Hematologic Cancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2003.04.031
- The paper
- Kantarjian, H. M., Gandhi, V., Kozuch, P., Faderl, S., Giles, F., Cortes, J., O’Brien, S., Ibrahim, N., Khuri, F., Du, M., Rios, M. B., Jeha, S., McLaughlin, P., Plunkett, W., & Keating, M. (2003). Phase I Clinical and Pharmacology Study of Clofarabine in Patients With Solid and Hematologic Cancers. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2003.04.031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.